Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA's Goss Wants to Get Back to Basics (buried 9/11 report)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:28 AM
Original message
CIA's Goss Wants to Get Back to Basics (buried 9/11 report)
Also on Goss' plate is how to handle a CIA inspector general report into the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The intelligence official said Goss has asked the inspector general to consider some changes to the report, still a draft, to make clear conclusions have not been reached about who personally should be held accountable. That could be handled by "accountability panel" established by Goss, the official said.

It's unclear how much the public will ever know about the report, which spans more than 300 pages. Internal CIA investigations are often classified for decades. For example, the CIA's internal probe of the ill-fated 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, which the agency backed, wasn't released publicly until 1998.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041105/ap_on_go_ot/second_term_intelligence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Amigust Donating Member (568 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. The coverup goes on and on. Yawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, I'm sure he's got paperclips to sort, and memos to rubber stamp
Busy, busy, busy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. B*. man. n/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's time for some leaks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dqueue Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. HAHAHAH!
There will be no leaks. I will be quite surprised if this 9/11 report ever sees the public light. Not to mention the Valerie Plame leak investigation, Larry Franklin the Israeli mole in the Pentagon investigation...

These will all wash away... it sucks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. still a draft my ass! this report was completed in june..
they've been sitting on this egg since then, at the behest of the junta. Now that junior has installed his boy Goss, we'll never see this report, which was exactly what I knew would happen. But don't you dare, don't you fucking DARE to suggest that they LIHOP! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. 'Draft' means 'Whitewash'
The turd Goss was Operation 40. He knows what "getting back to basics" means: murder, drug-dealing, war, total fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is what we get everytime congressional democrats attempt
to sweep aside something important because of a looming election. It always backfires on democrats. I believe that we ought to demand that congressional democrats deal straight forwardly with the issues when they arise because there may never be a better opportunity later. Now Goss has all the time and opportunity he needs to politicize the agency in favor of the reThugs, also he will suppress a critical report and demand instead a more reThug friendly one. Well we are screwed again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. my theory on this has always been: it's not broke.
the system isnt broke. its the operators of the system that need changing. the system served us well and i'm sure it can be improved. but this massiveness that 9/11 commission report is talking about. i wonder. was this s ome sort of way to tell bush that he needs to change?

i dunno. i've known quite a few people in the service and as much as i know, they arent the ones that should be blamed. the higher ups who are supposed to be connecting the dots, now that's where blame should be going. and lets not forget. how many caveats did bush get over iraq? and ignored every last one of 'em holdin up that cowboy image to the rescue.

but our intel is just as good as anybody elses... and of course it can always be improved. but was 9/11 a reason of faulty intelligence? i hardly think that's appropriate. warnings were given. the low-man on the totem pole is not who makes the decisions.

the bush presidency has been all about who can i blame for things when they don't go the way i want, and i mean everytyhing that goes wrong. yet they're shoving others out of the way when it comes time to take credit for something good. i dunno, forget about the deeds bush has (or in his case, has not) done. and look at the man. he's a con man. straight up 'i'm tje bpss so you have to do what i want', its easy to see where the 'with us or against us' comes from.

but there's another side to him. the evangelical side, the empty one, one without spirit. there's no spirit in george w. bush. people with spirit do not lay things out black and white all the time. people with spirit think for themselves, because that's whenGod is whispering. i can assure you, God has not been whisperting to george w. bush.

i've read the family, by kitty kelly, and thought it was trash straight up. i'm sure she meant it to be that way. but did i learn anything new about george w. bush? you bet. but what i learned to be true, basically only confirms what i had to take as chance & guesswork already. i dont interact with the guy, please. he couldn't handle me. but i do know him from just watching him, reading about his history, and it never dawned on me that the painted persona was not that much different from the human persona. people tend to make bush what they want bush to be, yet bush is one of these guys who gives 'em what he wants to give 'em. ego? maybe. but its something else. something unique in that it doesn't manifest in too many people. but president of the united states he was never meant to be. there's an aberration underway, and we can only hope and pray to God that he's on top of it. the presidency came across and he jumped on it. he wants to be the top dog, the one givin the orders, the one who doesnt ever have to take responsibility, and never ever admit to being wrong. some would blame his evangelical upbringing for that. i'm not so sure that evangelical lifestyle is what made george bush, george w. bush. it had a part, no doubt, ut it's more of a little boy always trying to win, win at all costs. that sorta thing.

but i am depressed that george got the whitehouse again. am i angry? you bet. but will i try to make a better situation knowing that bush is going to be one way, and i'll just have to be another way. i wish people didnt take everything we do that doesn't jibe with the bush mantra, as bush-bashing. why does bush gotta be the victim?

oye, its 3AM, and i'm still not sleepy. tired, but not sleepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why doesn't someone just slip us a copy of the report a la
Pentagon Papers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius 2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. An accountability panel?? WTF??? Personal responsibility to the party
of personal responsibility is a joke of gargantuan size.

These people are such fucking hypocrites, why can't we make them go away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. Undercover agent tapped for CIA post
Edited on Sat Nov-06-04 09:43 AM by sattahipdeep
By WALTER PINCUS
Washington Post
Nov. 4, 2004, 8:59PM

WASHINGTON - CIA Director Porter Goss has selected a 22-year
undercover logistics officer nicknamed "Dusty" as executive
director, the third-ranking position at the agency.
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/2885188
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardson08 Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. What's going on with the Plame situation?Who leaked her ID to Novak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. "Sept. 11, 2001, attacks" == "1961 Bay of Pigs invasion"????
Notice the equivalence relationship! The rationalization for the classification and suppression of the Bay of Pigs report is, by clear implication, applicable to the 9/11 report!

But, but, but ... the CIA was complicit in the Bay of Pigs invasion!

Are they saying the CIA was complicit in the 9/11 attacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. Thanks Dems- you guys liked Goss
Edited on Sat Nov-06-04 10:16 AM by depakote_kid
and you wouldn't fight- so you enjoy what you get
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
16. This Is Why
The Democrats in the Senate should have blocked his nomination until after the election. Any one with half a brain knew that this kind of thing was going to happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. National intelligence director...World Bank
It is assumed that Bush’s recently appointed CIA director,
former Rep. Porter J. Goss, will remain in his job or move
up to become national intelligence director if Congress
votes to create the position, as the 9/11 Commission
recommended.

If Powell does resign thoughts are he will return to
private life or accept the presidency of the World Bank.

http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20editorials/2004%20opinions/November/5%20n/Bushs%20Possible%20Choices%20for%20SecondTerm%20Cabinet.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. FUCK YOU GOSS.
You are a republican hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Native Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. FUCK YOU GOSS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC