Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush considers Clarence Thomas as chief Justice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
FM Arouet666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:03 PM
Original message
Bush considers Clarence Thomas as chief Justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like a trial balloon
Probably to be gazed upon by AA fundies. I wonder how the crazed-bigot-white-supremacist-fundies are going to like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. My GOD another Right Wing White Man as Chief Justice.
They need some diversity on the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Like Lance Ito in the O.J. Simpson trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pubic hair on the coke can. This would be a fitting choice
considering the state of the union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
it's brilliant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
64. Q: What did C. Thomas say when someone spilled a soft drink in his lap?
A: "HEY!, Who put the Coke in my pubic hair?!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
80. OMFG!! Why don't we all send that to Bush! . .(Bush. . .wink wink)
A bush for a Bush.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. I lost all respect for the Supremes after Bush v. Gore.
Thomas, C.J., would just be the frosting on the cake. If you want to feel a little better, they are hilariously naked in Jon Stewart's book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just following the bu$h pattern
of appointing the least qualified to top positions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a joke no?
Doesn't the Chief Justice have to speak in session? Ask questions even??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Or write an
opinion once in awhile?

What does this guy do except occupy space, use up precious oxygen and vote the same was as Scalia. Seriously, I'd rather have Scalia as Chief Justice.

MzPip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. NEVER wish for Scalia
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
57. Scalia is Clarence's puppet master. Promotion of the underling will cause
much ill will amonng the other supremes. :bounce: Thomas is an embarrassment to the court and they all know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is it really going to matter?
Sure, put the dumbest one in charge. Who cares. It's all going down the toilet anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I was just thinking that.
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 08:15 PM by chimpsrsmarter
He's not exactly the brightest bulb in the light fixture. I guess they are going with someone they can manipulate all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. What's he going to do when Scalia dies
and he doesn't have anyone to tell him what to do anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnybrook Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
39. sounds like the executive branch
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 10:28 PM by sunnybrook
with the dumbest one in charge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikepallas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Talk about a fox in charge of a hen house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The King of Porn
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
37. Absolutely true
the owners of WDC porn shops called him their best customer.
FACT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Keep in mind Thomas might serve for 50 more years.
At least 35-40.

Think about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. That actually means Scalia
CT is his puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I agree.
He throws the totally unsuitable CT up there (and I'm not even talking about his absurd views, just his lack of anything distinquishing on the court -- other than mediocrity) and then clears the way for Scalia, who is considered to be oh so very intelligent.

I just hope the Dems don't fall for it, and stay strong. Although Scalia is capable of writing a few intelligent-sounding paragraphs, his concept of the constitution is deeply flawed, and downright dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
43. If he is put up as CJ
...then the Dems ought to say, "Mmm...Okee-dokee!"

Rove's head would spin. Cheney would need yet another heart transplant. Billy-Joe-Bob-Bubba would crap his overalls. And we would do a happy dance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #43
61. Well, I think they'd genuinely be happy with that idiot
as CJ. But they probably realize that his performance has only highlighted what many thought before his confirmation: that he's a second-rate jurist, dedicated to some radical ideas about the constitution.

That said, we've got a president only too happy with second-rate, and intelligence isn't something he's qualified to judge. I think he'd be quite happy with CT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Long Dong Silver as our Chief Justice... another slap at women. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. It'll never happen. Redneck/red states are too racist to accept this.
The latent racism throughout the GOP has leapt into view with their attitude toward Iraqis and muslims in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Did they balk at Powell and Rice?
Think of what Belafonte said. The masters found faithful house slaves quite useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Sure it could
He may be a darkie but he's their darkie. He's a perfect cover for their racism. <sarcasm>

"See? We're not racists! We approve of Clarence Thomas as Chief Justice."

MzPip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. that was the reasoning
when poppy nominated him - see how 'liberal' we R. We nominate dumb f*cks for the supreme court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. oh, goodie, we want to let the Repukes hang themselves
with their very own cigar scandal. Oh, wait a minute, at least Clinton had some class, this idiot uses coke cans ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Isere Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. He would have to be confirmed, wouln't he?
Maybe David Brock could testify at the hearings?

Deja vu all over again!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
67. This is why I don't think it will be Thomas
I think it'll be Scalia. The Thomas hearings were so contentious and he was only approved 52-48.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. Well, it was either going to be him or Scalia.
I can't see much that makes either one preferable to the other.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Isere Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. Boycott Drudge!
Take him off of your Favorites!
Don't let him get $$$ from his advertisers because we pump up his hits meter.

Since Tuesday I have been boycotting all the right wing purveyors of "news" on the net and on cable tv.

There is plenty of time to learn about Clarence Thomas and his supposed appointment. We don't need Drudge to tell us about it.

Just sayin'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. I second that! Boycott Drudge and his sludge! Starve the beast!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. Does the Chief Justice position have to be confirmed by the Senate?
Sorry, I cannot read the story. I refuse to give Drudge the hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #24
68. Yes - Thomas would have to resign
and become re-confirmed...as any sitting associate would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. Now you know that's a lie. But one dummy would pick another dummy.
Talk about getting the moderates on our side. A few more of these calls by Bush and the Republicans won't be able to stand themselves.
They are imploding already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Maybe the Democrats ought to think about using the house
servants to their advantage and they could win some elections. I wonder why they don't, perhaps all the racism isn't on the other side. Keep at it Dems you will be history before long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. Hey, you don't know who I am or what I am.
In this case both Bush and Thomas are called "dummy."
I don't discriminate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ydya Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
30. Why not? We got an idiot POTUS, why not an idiot CJSCOTUS? eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. My first thought with these folks is to move toward the most cynical
reason this story is being floated. They know that many people disenfranchised at the polls. They throw out a bone, a consideration if you will that indicates some kind of progressive movement. I rather doubt he is interested. He rarely if ever asks a question during proceedings. On the other hand if what they are looking for is someone who will bend completely to their will maybe he is their pick. I bet they will go with Scalia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Scalia cover
This would only be done as a cover for making Scalia the de facto chief justice. Thomas has shown himself to be nothing but a surrogate who makes every Scalia vote count as two. The man has no integrity or spine of his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. Scalia is to Thomas as Cheney is to Bush
Do y'all suppose this may have sprung up in conversation on that hunting trip.

But to the great unwashed out there here will be their chance to show the world how accepting they are of minorities. Gosh they may even replace O'conner with another woman. Katherine Harris springs to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
72. POTUS has to go away, eventually. CJ is with is for decades. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlFrankenFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. Rehnquist died?
'Scuse me if I've been living in a hole since Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. Now the conservatives are going to taste the wrath of our ...
...culture war!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. Terrific. The person with the LEAST legal acumen for a TOP legal post.
Does Bush & Co. start off their day saying, "What simple decision can we screw up the most? Ok go with that!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Same can be said about the top of the Republican party.
And he was "elected" President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
35. cynical use of the "race card"?
Guess in rethuglican world they think that we can't reject a black man, no matter how much of a kiss ass he may be. Geez, it's just Scalia with a black face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. This was stated as a goal of the RNC. How low can they go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
45. Clarence Thomas? OMFG - he's the WORST Justice in history
Say it isn't so! OMG - This guy has as much integrity as a cow paddy - Chief Justice? Have they gone insane? This just can't be real. Tell me I'm dreaming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. We already have the worst president in history
and the worst Senate Majority Leader and the worst Speaker of the House. Might as well punk the judicial branch, too, by appointing the worst Chief Justice in history. Another trifecta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Doesn't this make you think the US is going to self-destruct though?
People of Thomas' ilk are the type to destroy a nation. That man has no sense of fairness or decency - how would the US survive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. Thurgood Marshall is rolling over in his grave n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
49. Clarence Thomas: A Man Of Morals???????????? Give Me A Fucking Break!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cubsfan forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #49
75. Seconded! CT is a racist, sexist moron! n/t
Professor 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrix Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
51. Go ahead - we'll just impeach his appointments
Once we get congress back the FIRST order of business is to impeach ANY fascist justice bush appoints to the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Star Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Can we do that?
Seriously, can we impeach the supremes? Is it the same as impeaching the preznit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judynyc Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. Yes
The Constitution says that they are on for life and "during good behavior." Scalia could have been impeached for not recusing himself on that Cheney thing a while back.

I don't believe it's ever been done, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
53. Whatever the Bushit does with the Supreme Court
Is gonna make us hurl. Thomas is about as right for Chief Justice as Bushit's brain could get.
:crazy: :grr: :puke: :crazy: :grr: :puke: :crazy: :grr: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judynyc Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
55. So typical
Thomas is the least credentialed member of the Supreme Court. That's probably what makes him a fitting Chief Justice in Bush's eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
56. I don't know what is worse
Right wing nuts running the executive branch and SCOTUS, or two fucking imbeciles running the Executive branch and SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
58. Mr Chief Justice? I never did understand the pubic hairs on the Coke can.
Could you discuss that again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
59. Ahhh yes...Mr. Family Values himself. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
60. This is Bush's Affirmative Action Program
The Sorriest of a sorry example though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
62. Puke!!!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
almostallhere Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
63. the man has fallen asleep in every oral argument i've seen.
despicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
65. Thomas Is Underqualified to be a LAW CLERK
Much less Chief Justice. He's a sorry excuse for a judge, and a sorrier excuse for a human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
66. There is some ironic justice that Scalia is probably out of the running
Given his intervention in the 2000 election, Scalia, who would be the most formidable Chief Justice, pretty much disqualified himself as too controversial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimpanzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
69. I'm a Uniter not a Divider - RIGHT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marew Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
70. This is a sick joke...RIGHT!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
71. You know, I think this is the first thing Durge has come up with
that I really believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
73. Even Clarence can't believe he would do something THAT stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. Caption this picture Above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. Or here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
77. More than a Trial , it's real

I heard that Uncle Clarence had already been "interviewed" for the position before the election.

Watch it happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RememberTheCoup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
78. I won't click on Drudge. Ever.
However, aside from the chilling political implications of this, isn't it just a bit tacky for Bush OR Drudge to be discussing replacements for Rehnquist while he is in poor health?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
79. In an unrelated story, Coca-Cola stock hits a 12-month high
Edited on Mon Nov-08-04 02:26 PM by KamaAina
:evilgrin:

Seriously, won't Big Tony be just a teeny bit cheesed off about being passed over for his own buttboy?

Edit: teeny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC