Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boxer's rebellion and Democrats' new tone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:04 PM
Original message
Boxer's rebellion and Democrats' new tone
WASHINGTON – Still smarting from the loss of their party leader in November's vote, Senate Democrats are setting a deliberately lower and softer profile at the start of the 109th Congress - except for the ones tossing bombs.
The leading flamethrower would be Sen. Barbara Boxer, who rocked the opening days of the session by initially blocking the presidential electoral vote count and, more recently, by ripping into Secretary of State-designate Condoleezza Rice during her Senate confirmation bid.

The contrast between Senator Boxer's moves and the more modulated tones of the party's new Senate leadership team is partly a matter of personal style, but it also reflects the challenge that Democrats face as the minority party after an election that left many shellshocked. They want to expand their reach into the American electorate and avoid the "obstructionist" label, while reassuring core activists that the party is not going soft.

"It's the old good cop, bad cop routine: The leadership will take the high road, and others will aggressively oppose every move of the Bush administration," says Marshall Wittmann, a former GOP adviser now with the Democratic Leadership Council. "A sophisticated opposition doesn't take just one approach."

more...

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0126/p01s02-uspo.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. a former GOP adviser now with the Democratic Leadership Council
I think that pretty much says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. 'bout time.
I live in Columbus, Ohio and Ms. Boxer is my senator. We must fight
this unelected criminal enterprise called bush and company NOW!

LLBR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do The same rules apply now?
If you believe a large chunk of the electorate, the electoral process in America is broken. In addition to Democrats being denied voting rights using good ol' fashioned techniques of ballot box allocation, dirty tricks and suppression, we now have "vapor balloting" to deal with. To firm up this fine souffle of ca-ca we also have to deal with a media so totally concentrated and co opted, our messages are not heard by a large chunk of Americans unless it comes spewing forth from the corpulent faces on hate radio and cable news.

The Democrats need to fight on every level and concentrate on fair voting and media reform/infrastructure. They also need to incubate the "buy blue" philosophy of punishing corporations that attempt to subvert our Democracy by subsidizing the networks that bring us our daily serving of lies, deceit and misdirection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doodadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obstructionist???
So.....what's so bad about being labeled an Obstructionist? It sounds like a good thing to me: obstructing Republicans/BushCo. from waging war, destroying domestic programs, destroying the earth. How is that a bad thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obstructionist??? I think it's supposed to be called the
"Loyal Opposition" and for those democrats who don't remember, the Opposition is supposed to OPPOSE!!!!

I mean What part of OPPOSE don't they get!?!?

God help us -- I can't' even imagine what's in store for us, given wimpy democrats and fire-breathing repukes, who can't wait to privatize just about everything except for those things they'd rather bomb. Go Barbara Go -- I am so proud to say she's my senator! She's our only glimmer of enlightenment during these dark, dark days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMeKate Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. embrace obstructionism!
Thats why they call it the opposition party!


and dont just make it about Tone, make it about policy too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC