Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Environment Ignored in New Democratic Agenda: Liberty Belle Log

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 08:21 PM
Original message
Environment Ignored in New Democratic Agenda: Liberty Belle Log
EDITORIAL:
ENVIRONMENT IGNORED IN NEW DEMOCRATIC AGENDA

By Miriam Raftery, Editor
Liberty Belle Log

I applaud the ambitious Democratic agenda laid out this week by Senator Harry Reid, complete with ten new bills to promote real American values. But the agenda has one gaping hole: the environment.

Pandering to corporate interests at the expense of public health, the Bush administration has amassed the worst environmental record of any president. Bush and his cronies in Congress have effectively dismantled our nation’s framework of environmental laws, standards and enforcement. (For details, see Environment2004’s report, “The Bush Environmental Record: An Unprecedented Assault on our Health and Heritage.” (http://www.environment2004.org/documents.php)

Under pressure from corporate polluters, Bush let the Superfund tax for cleaning up toxic waste dumps expire, causing the fund to dwindle while millions of Americans continue living near contaminated sites. Further, the President now wants to exempt the military entirely from cleaning up its toxic wastes. Never mind that percholate, a harmful chemical found in rocket fuel used by the military, has been discovered in drinking water in 20% of American states.

Medical experts I’ve interviewed recently express alarm that mercury poisoning is reaching epidemic proportions in America—due largely to increased pollution of our public waterways and oceans. Rates of environmentally-induced cancers have also risen sharply.

The President’s “Clear Skies” initiative is a misnomer, since it results in increased fouling of our air. Is it any wonder that asthma rates are up over 70% nationwide in recent years?

We are also seeing many serious respiratory conditions developing among New York residents and rescue workers. Many could have been avoided if the EPA had issued warnings. Instead, EPA administrator Christine Whitman falsely assured the public that the air was safe.

Because of this cover-up, New Yorkers and visitors to the 9/11 site were exposed to over 400,000 pounds of lead, 200,000 pounds of asbestos, radioactive americium, and enough mercury to contaminate 2,500 city blocks! Half of all workers who cleared Ground Zero now have serious respiratory problems, along with many firefighters and children from nearby schools. (http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/jimmy_walter_battles_bush_admin.htm )

Moreover, the administration has opened up National Parks for snowmobilers, threatening protected wildlife and parklands. It has allowed the destruction of wild horses, and approved hunting of buffalo right outside Yellowstone National Park’s borders. Next up, the White House wants to weaken the Endangered Species Act and open fragile arctic wilderness areas for oil drilling, further threatening America’s wildlife.

Worst of all, President Bush refuses to admit that global warming exists. He ignores the broad consensus of global scientists who warn that ominous signs of global warming are already occurring, including rapid melting of glaciers in Alaska and the breaking up of state-sized blocks of ice in Antaractica.

(http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/25/science/earth/25ice.html?pagewanted=1) Increasingly violent hurricanes, drought, and Western wildfires may all be attributable to increased global temperatures. Britain’s chief scientist gravely warns that global warming poses a greater threat to our security than global terrorism.

In a January 24, 2005 n article titled “Report: Global warming approaching critical point,” Associated Press reveals that “global warming is approaching the critical point of no return, after which widespread drought, crop failure, and rising sea levels would be irreversible,” according to a report titled “Meeting the Climate Challenge.” The independent report was prepared by the Institute for Public Policy Research in Britain, the Center for American Progress in the United States, and The Australia Institute.

The report urges leading industrial nations to cut carbon emissions, double their research spending on green technology and work with India and China to build on the Kyoto Protocol. Bush has refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol, choosing to protect short-term profits for industry over long-term protection of our planet. http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/01/24/climate.change.ap/

Democrats who kowtow to the corporate-backed Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) by ignoring these serious environmental concerns are doing their constitutents, our Party, and our planet a grave disservice. Surely protecting the health of our families and our planet should be a greater priority than preserving corporate donations for politicians!

Please join me in contacting Senator Reid (D-Nevada), along with your own Senators and Congressional members, and ask them to add these important environmental issues into the Democratic Agenda. We need our leaders to sponsor bills to correct the serious deterioration of our environment. Our futures—and our lives—are at stake!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is the way politics is done in the US, unfortunately
Because politicians must solicit money for their campaigns in the US, then the ones with the most money and the most resources have a competitive advantage everytime. This is the way things are in this government, and it has been this way since the beginning of this Republic.

The Democrats have to get their money from somewhere, and getting money from a few wealthy individuals with huge bank accounts is far easier than trying to get the same amount of money from millions of poor folks who are so damn broke they cannot even afford health care or a decent education. As a result, they must keep these bankrollers happy, and sacrificing the environment is the opportunity cost of doing business.

(These are my personal observations of how things work, at least in my opinion. Don't mistake this as support of the way things are. I do not support this status quo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the dems raised MORE money then the reTHUGs this year OVER $300 mil
Edited on Wed Jan-26-05 09:30 PM by bpilgrim
in $5, $10s and $20s though don't expect to hear that mentioned very often on the teeVee...

old school, yall young'ns got lots to learn ;->

welcome to DU :toast:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMeKate Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. cowards
dont sell out our children for corporate campaign cash democrats!

Most americans consider themselves environmentalists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. this is exactly why I won't sign Harvey's pledge of support . . .
not addressing energy and the environment is completely irresponsible . . . until they do, the Dems can take their plan and put it where the sun don't shine . . . which, considering BushCo's environmental record, will soon be just about everywhere . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC