Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Selling Washington (we want conservative activist Republicans on K Street)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 06:23 PM
Original message
Selling Washington (we want conservative activist Republicans on K Street)
Edited on Sat Jun-04-05 06:26 PM by Pirate Smile
Selling Washington
By Elizabeth Drew
1.
As the criminal investigation of the Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff was underway this spring, a spokesman for the law firm representing him issued a statement saying that Abramoff was "being singled out by the media for actions that are commonplace in Washington and are totally proper." Abramoff has since said much the same thing. The lawyer was half right. Like many other lobbyists, Abramoff often arranged for private organizations, particularly nonprofit groups, to sponsor pleasant, even luxurious, trips for members of Congress, with lobbyists like himself tagging along and enjoying the unparalleled "access" that such a setting provides; i.e., they get to know congressmen and sell them on legislation. They take over skyboxes at sporting events, inviting members of Congress and their staffs.

-snip-
Abramoff's behavior is symptomatic of the unprecedented corruption—the intensified buying and selling of influence over legislation and federal policy —that has become endemic in Washington under a Republican Congress and White House. Corruption has always been present in Washington, but in recent years it has become more sophisticated, pervasive, and blatant than ever. A friend of mine who works closely with lobbyists says, "There are no restraints now; business groups and lobbyists are going crazy—they're in every room on Capitol Hill writing the legislation. You can't move on the Hill without giving money."

-snip-
The Republican purge of K Street is a more thorough, ruthless, vindictive, and effective attack on Democratic lobbyists and other Democrats who represent businesses and other organizations than anything Washington has seen before. The Republicans don't simply want to take care of their friends and former aides by getting them high-paying jobs: they want the lobbyists they helped place in these jobs and other corporate representatives to arrange lavish trips for themselves and their wives; to invite them to watch sports events from skyboxes; and, most important, to provide a steady flow of campaign contributions. The former aides become part of their previous employers' power networks. Republican leaders also want to have like-minded people on K Street who can further their ideological goals by helping to formulate their legislative programs, get them passed, and generally circulate their ideas. When I suggested to Grover Norquist, the influential right-wing leader and the leading enforcer of the K Street Project outside Congress, that numerous Democrats on K Street were not particularly ideological and were happy to serve corporate interests, he replied, "We don't want nonideological people on K Street, we want conservative activist Republicans on K Street."

The K Street Project has become critical to the Republicans' efforts to control all the power centers in Washington: the White House, Congress, the courts—and now, at least, an influential part of the corporate world, the one that raises most of the political money. It's another way for Republicans to try to impose their programs on the country. The Washington Post reported recently that House Majority Whip Roy Blunt, of Missouri, has established "a formal, institutionalized alliance" with K Street lobbyists. They have become an integral part of the legislative process by helping to get bills written and passed—and they are rewarded for their help by the fees paid by their clients. Among the results are legislation that serves powerful private interests all the more openly—as will be seen, the energy bill recently passed by the House is a prime example —and a climate of fear that is new. The conservative commentator David Brooks said on PBS's NewsHour earlier this year, "The biggest threat to the Republican majority is the relationship on K Street with corporate lobbyists and the corruption that is entailed in that." But if the Republicans are running a risk of being seen as overreaching in their takeover of K Street, there are few signs that they are concerned about it.

more ....
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/18075
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Despite its effectiveness, "the K Street Project is far from complete," according to Norquist, who says, "There should be as many Democrats working on K Street representing corporate America as there are Republicans working in organized labor—and that number is close to zero." He wants the project to include not just the top jobs in K Street firms, but "all of them—including secretaries."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. SBC Communications fired William Dailey
Edited on Sat Jun-04-05 07:00 PM by Gman
from his position as head honcho of PR. Eventhough Dailey didn't get the job done on SBC legislation as SBC wanted, I didn't think he was bad enough to go. It's now obvious Dailey was a victim of the K Street Project.

Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. This smacks of racketeering
and not just a little extortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Norquist is so baldly amoral, he's probably committed more than one crime
Hillbilly Hitler art:



Blog:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a blessing in disguise if Dems have balls to take it
Imagine a commercial like this:

"If all the corporate lobbyists are republicans, whose side is your GOP congressman going take when you're getting screwed by big business?

Come home to the Democratic Party--where we listen to people who work for a living, not the businesses trying to screw them."

Hillbilly Hitler art:



Blog:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. OK, take 2 with a little bit of tact, and I think you've got it.
I understand perfectly what you mean by "screwed", but there may be a less crass and more informative way to say the same thing.


"If all the corporate lobbyists are republicans, whose side is your GOP congressman going take - the big business lobbyists offering him a all expense paid trip - or you the humble taxpayer expecting him to do the job you have already paid him to do?

Come home to the Democratic Party--where the answer to that question is, "You, of course."

We listen to people who work for a living, not the businesses trying to buy their way out of consequences for unethical behavior."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well they'd better find a new Commander-and-Thief!

http://images/globalfreepress.com/

May 20, 2005: Bush's Approval ratings are swirling rapidly downward much like our country.

Don't think the "majority" of Americans are happy with any Republicans, right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildClarySage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Maybe not, but
when they own the machines, and are able to use wedge issues to distract people from what's really important in this country, then it doesn't matter how popular/unpopular Shrubbie is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Everyone knows "they own the machines..."
That's what needs to be changed, A.S.A.P! If not, we'd might as well do what this little guy is doing: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC