Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Public starts to get a fix on 'fixing' intelligence (Boston Globe)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:53 AM
Original message
Public starts to get a fix on 'fixing' intelligence (Boston Globe)
By Dick Polman

Inquirer Political Analyst


Shortly after his November triumph, President Bush declared that voters had endorsed his prosecution of the war in Iraq. In his words, "We had an accountability moment, and that's called the 2004 elections."

But today, with U.S. casualties rising and military recruitment falling, it is clear that Bush's accountability moment has been extended. Even though he won't run for office again, voters continue to assess the signature decision of his presidency; in growing numbers, they are voicing dissatisfaction.

And amid all this unease - for the first time, a majority of Americans say that the war launched in March 2003 has not made this nation safer - a growing grassroots movement is spotlighting a once-secret British government memorandum, written in the summer of 2002, that depicts Bush as having already decided to wage war, even though the case against Saddam Hussein was "thin."

Americans are probably more conversant about Angelina Jolie than about the contents of the so-called Downing Street memo, which was leaked in London seven weeks ago to the Rupert Murdoch-owned Sunday Times. But if the war chaos continues (80 U.S. troops and 700 Iraqis died last month), the awareness gap may narrow - because the memo states that as Washington was preparing for war, "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy." <snip>

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/nation/11872791.htm

Nice little teardown of the Rs denial strategy ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't it just sweet to see more and more of these editorials?
I think the dam is about to break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. You can't fool all of the people all of the time.
Didn't a Republican say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. NO! It Was A Unitarian--P.T.Barnum
of circus fame. I think he specialized in freak exhibits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Barnum?
It's considered by some to be an anonymous quote, usually attributed to Lincoln.

HOWEVER, I would be seriously careful of attributing anything to Barnum. Many of his best lines were really from Mike McDonald, Chicago's gambling boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. the stupid MSM needs to stop calling this document a 'memo'. It is NOT
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 06:16 AM by ixion
that. It is the minutes of a meeting, the facts of which are NOT disputed by the British gov't.


Frankly, the tone of this editorial is still (way) thick-headed, IMO.

Do you see how it's passively trying to quell curiosity about the issue, even as it speaks of growing interest?

"a once-secret British government memorandum, written in the summer of 2002, that depicts Bush as having already decided to wage war, even though the case against Saddam Hussein was "thin."


See that? First they use the 'official' word 'memorandum', which is entirely incorrect. Then it uses the word 'depicts' to imply (biased) characterization, not a fact. Then (incredulously) it states the 'case' against Hussein (affirmation in the positive...what case? there is no case.) as being 'thin' (again, affirmation in the positive. It's easier to rationalize if something is 'thin' rather than 'bogus').

As far as I'm concerned, people who write this garbage are just as culpable, just as GUILTY, of war crimes as BushCo, because they continue to rationalize their actions through subtle language manipulation. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Downing Street memo is just the tip of a monstrously large iceberg
upon which the ship of state flounders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat@14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great op-ed. Love seeing them trickle in. To the contrary,
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 09:32 AM by splat@14
don't ya hate 30 day old "news"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Check the roasting pan
This pig is done. Stick the apple in his mouth and lets have a luau.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. The term "fix" in England means to alter or modify, not repair
I have read some American articles that bring into question the word "fix"

Since it was in an English memo, I am assuming (and it makes more sense, contextually) that it means the facts were altered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC