Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Molly Ivins: The definition of insanity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:38 AM
Original message
Molly Ivins: The definition of insanity
Sometimes you look at the people Bush appoints to high public office and the only possible response is, "What were they thinking?"

Zalmay Khalilzad for U.S. ambassador to Iraq? Why not just send Richard Perle? Khalilzad is a second-rank neo-con with all the same credentials as the rest of those bozos -- pre-emptive war, world hegemony, Project for a New American Century... the whole stinking lot of it. Plus, he's been a big booster for Iran's ayatollahs, the Afghani Mujahideen and the Taliban, not to mention an oil company consultant. Isn't that just jim-dandy?

What this tells us is that the administration has learned exactly nothing from the past three years of insurgency in Iraq. The 1,700-dead, $1 billion-a-week mistake will continue to be run in exactly the same way we have already proved doesn't work. We'll keep trying to put out a growing insurgency with too small an army as the country drifts ever-closer to civil war. It's like Ben Franklin's definition of insanity -- doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results.

As one who has long argued that George W. Bush is not stupid, I must admit that not learning from your mistakes is a prime signal of stupidity. But of course, in order to learn from your mistakes, you have to recognize you made them. The president assured us just last week he is "heartened" by what is happening in Iraq and, "I am pleased with the progress." The vice president says there is "major progress" and the insurgency is in its "last throes." These folks are in such deep denial.

more...

http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=19193
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why should Ratface do anything differently?
He's not been held to account for anything he's done, so why should he even acknowledge that he's done anything wrong?

I love Molly Ivins, but she's pushing water uphill with this one. The arrogance of these bastards is growing daily, since there's no one - absolutely no one - to call them on what they're doing.

Remember when Ratface had a "nice visit" with the 9/11 Commission? Didn't take the oath, didn't swear to tell the truth, and had Cheney with him to hold his hand and pull the string that makes his mouth move. Everyone else - including Bill Clinton - appeared under oath, and appeared alone (as far as I know).

They're not in denial. They're saying whatever the hell they want to say, in spite of every fact contradicting what they try to foist on us with their foul words, because they can.

Because they're seized with absolute power right now, and that's the damnable and horrific truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, I agree that Molly is being a little naive on this
They don't consider these appointments mistakes at all, since they want to destroy the organizations that these "disassemblers" are appointed to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommymac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. And a Lapdog, not a Watchdog, press helps too....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. We judge right and wrong by what we know to be right and wrong
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 07:49 AM by Gman
the problem is these people either 1) do not care about right and wrong or 2) have a totally different concept of right and wrong. I think its a combination of both. Therefore, our outrage doesn't mean a damn thing because they're going to do exactly what they want to do in total disregard of true right and wrong either through ignorance or, more likely, total disregard of right and wrong.

They do not expect different results from redoing things. They don't care that there are adverse results. I think they consider the adverse results consequential to their real plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Actually
...fundamental to the NeoCon worldview is the belief that there is effectively no right or wrong. They believe that the ends justify the means.

For example, they are quite willing, encouraged even to use religion as a propaganda tool to control the masses. Read Machiavelli's The Prince to see the root of their political philosophy. Deception is encouraged if it provides a means to an end.

They believe that the world will be safer under US dominion and they are willing to "break a few eggs" to achieve this goal. Right and wrong don't really enter into the picture. They are in control and will ruthlessly wield that power to "change the world." In that respect, that have not really strayed from their roots in radical leftist politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good observation
they have not strayed from their roots in radical leftist politics. They remember what they learned way back then and apply it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC