http://www.palmbeachpost.com/opinion/content/opinion/epaper/2005/06/19/a2e_limbaughedit_0619.htmlRush Limbaugh's attorney keeps saying that his client is innocent. So why does he keep acting as though his client is guilty?
Every court has decided that Palm Beach County prosecutors acted legally in November 2003 when they obtained search warrants to seize the talk-show host's medical records as part of an investigation into illegal use of prescription painkillers. Six weeks ago, the Florida Supreme Court declined to review lower courts' decisions that sided with prosecutors. Yet last week, Roy Black was back before the judge who issued the search warrant, arguing that Mr. Limbaugh, who broadcasts much of the time from Palm Beach, should be able to decide which records the prosecutors will see.
Inside the studio where he fulminates for 15 hours a week, Mr. Limbaugh rules. Outside that studio, the rules of society apply to Mr. Limbaugh, whether he likes it or not. Since prosecutors had to persuade two judges before getting the records, there is no great privacy issue here. The simple concept is that no one can use privacy to shield evidence of a crime.
Presumably, Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Thomas Barkdull will agree. The decision is an easy one in every way. Mr. Black's motion asks that, if Mr. Limbaugh doesn't get the records, a judge review them in private to determine with prosecutors which ones are relevant to the investigation. As this newspaper has noted, that's what State Attorney Barry Krischer has agreed to all along. Despite what the talk-show host has claimed, as he tries to shift attention from himself, Mr. Krischer's office seeks neither to embarrass Mr. Limbaugh nor to score political points. The investigation led to Mr. Limbaugh. After his housekeeper told The National Enquirer that she gave Mr. Limbaugh large quantities of pills, the host underwent treatment for addiction.