Modest proposal to solve Social Security problem (Ehrenreich)

[struggle4progress]

<snip> But can such namby-pamby solutions really get to the root of the problem? Isn't it clear that there are just too many old people around, luxuriating in their assisted-living communities and expecting the government to support their statin and beta-blocker habits? Does no one have the courage to confront the longevity crisis head-on?

There are exceptions - a few Americans brave enough to try. Some credit should go to Burger King for its new "Enormous Omelet Sandwich," and to Hardee's for its "Monster Burger" (two one-third-pound patties.) Nor can we neglect the manufacturers of the various cardiovascularly compromising painkillers, such as Celebrex and Vioxx. In addition, Wyeth, the pharmaceutical company whose aggressively marketed hormone replacement therapy pill turned out to cause breast cancer and heart disease, deserves some retrospective recognition.

The longevity-fighting Purple Heart, though, goes to the Center for Consumer Freedom, funded by the tobacco and restaurant industries, which bravely battles restrictions on indoor smoking, repressive limits on blood-alcohol levels for drivers and the relentless liberal bad-mouthing of salt, fat, sugar and meat. And what has the CCF gotten for its efforts? A challenge to its tax-exempt status from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

Face it, nothing is really going to change until the federal government tackles the problem itself. It might start drafting 60-year-olds, for example, for a few months of service in the Iraqi desert. And what about transforming the Drug Enforcement Administration into the Diet Enforcement Administration, with the power to search drivers for stray bits of broccoli and tofu? <snip>

http://www.bergen.com/page.php?qstr=eXJpcnk3ZjczN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk0MDYmZmdiZWw3Zjd2cWVlRUV5eTY3MTEwNTAmeXJpcnk3ZjcxN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk5

[mom cat]

1. What a delight! Barbara at her best! Thanks.

[Enquiringkitty]

2. I travel for a living and in every state I've been in, one of their big

problems is the over crowding of their schools and finding the money to build bigger ones. The argument that there are no enough people in the following generations to pay into the system must not take into account the number of pre-teens in schools now. The pre-teen population is near the baby-boomer population and the population of children even younger is larger. Does Bush think these kids are not going to work or has he planed for them to be the new recruits for the on-going Iraq freedom tour. With no end date in sight, it might still be going on ... after all, our troops in Korea were told year after year that they would be home by Christmas and we still have troops there today. Anyway, our population is growing and there will be people paying into the system. One little thing they could do is only give funds/ or full funds to people in low income brackets. I would gladly give up my social security check if my yearly income after retirement is $100,000 but I will still need Medicare because one age related disorder can wipe that out pretty quick.