http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8565225/site/newsweek/Contentious news conferences are nothing new in the hothouse of the James S. Brady press briefing room at the White House. But new evidence about Karl Rove’s role in the Valerie Plame leak has turned the already tense daily press briefings into something of a frenzy. On Monday, reporters repeatedly slammed White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan for refusing to comment on questions about Rove’s discussions with Time magazine’s Matthew Cooper, in which the White House deputy chief of staff told the reporter that former ambassador Joseph Wilson’s wife worked for the CIA. When reporters pressed McClellan if he stood by previous comments that Rove had no involvement in the leaking of Plame’s name, the Bush spokesman demurred, saying “I appreciate the question”—but adding that he couldn’t comment because of an “on-going investigation.”
That was a line repeated by McClellan’s boss after a cabinet meeting on Wednesday. “I have instructed every member of my staff to fully cooperate in this investigation. I also will not prejudge the investigation based on media reports,” President Bush told reporters. “We’re in the midst of an ongoing investigation and I will be more than happy to comment further once the investigation is completed.” That would be fine if neither President Bush nor McClellan had commented before on the investigation. Unfortunately for both of them, their comments were fully recorded and broadcast all the way through last year.
This leaves White House aides with only one escape route, short of telling the full story about what Rove said and what Bush knew. That escape route is to fall back on personal charm and goodwill. The only problem is that five years into this administration, and three years after the searing experience of the run-up to war in Iraq, there’s not a lot of goodwill left to go around. So McClellan returned to the briefing room Tuesday to find it even more crowded than usual, with every seat filled and correspondents lining the aisles. McClellan smiled and tried to make nice by joking about Bush’s scheduled meeting that morning with NCAA champion sports teams. “I don’t know why the Longhorns aren’t here,” McClellan quipped, referring to his alma mater, the University of Texas. When no one laughed, McClellan looked a little nervous.
He had every reason to feel that way. Minutes later, he was back to dodging questions on Rove and, more often than not, his own credibility. Back in 2003, McClellan said it was “ridiculous” to think Rove was involved in the Plame leak. (Although Rove was a Cooper source, there is no evidence that Rove told the reporter—or even knew—Plame's name or identified her as a covert operative.) This week, McClellan and other White House officials have offered up no such defense, remaining silent on a story that the administration clearly hopes will go away. But, judging by the mood of the White House press corps, that’s not likely to happen anytime soon. The frustration over McClellan’s silence this week has reached fever pitch not just because of the feeling that the White House may have misled the media about Rove’s role, but also because reporters have become increasingly fed up with what they see as the White House’s stonewalling on other issues, including Iraq, Social Security and, most recently, Bush’s search for a Supreme Court nominee.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
