Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

[WebProNews] Did Anti-Spam Gang Kill Russian Spammer?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Buck Turgidson Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 03:21 PM
Original message
[WebProNews] Did Anti-Spam Gang Kill Russian Spammer?
Certain anti-spam parties have made threats in the past against some of the world's more notorious spammers.

Russia's Interfax news agency reports that notorious spammer Vardan Kushnir was found brutally murdered. His body was discovered in his Moscow apartment on Sunday, showing evidence of repeated blows to the head.

Mr. Kushnir headed English learning centers known for their persistent aggressive spamming. Millions of messages sent by the firms went out each day. Spamming is not presently illegal under Russian law.

Some angry users have retaliated against his firms by plaguing them with numerous phone calls, bombarding it with emails, or even advertising the firms' phone numbers in bogus ads for escort services or bargain real estate offers.


http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusinessnews/wpn-45-20050725DidAntiSpamGangKillRussianSpammer.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. See prior thread: Russia’s Biggest Spammer Brutally Murdered in Apartment
Edited on Mon Jul-25-05 03:46 PM by IanDB1
Russia’s Biggest Spammer Brutally Murdered in Apartment
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1653019

These are some "Anti-Spam Vigilante" methods of dubious morality.

But at least nobody gets bludgeoned to death (sigh).


Project Honeypot
http://www.projecthoneypot.org/

and

Blue Frog
http://www.bluesecurity.com/

SpamCop is the premier service for reporting spam. SpamCop determines the origin of unwanted email and reports it to the relevant Internet service providers. By reporting spam, you have a positive impact on the problem. Reporting unsolicited email also helps feed spam filtering systems, including, but not limited to, SpamCop's own service.
http://www.spamcop.net/


WebPoison.org is an open source project, the goal of which is to contaminate internet "spambots" and "spam spiders", by giving them bogus HTML web pages which contain bogus email addresses. (Actually, the real goal is to make spambots and spam spiders obey the HTML "robots" meta element, but we'll get to that later. )
http://www.webpoison.org/about.html



See:


Spam block has its own ethical issues
By Hiawatha Bray | July 25, 2005
A couple of years ago, this column featured the prediction that the junk e-mail problem would be coming under control right about now. So much for clairvoyance.

<snip>

Blue Security's system, called Blue Frog, is available free at bluesecurity.com. Blue Frog registers the user's e-mail address, then creates a dozen or so fake addresses linked to the real address. The phony addresses are ''honeypots," designed solely to trap spam. When junk mail turns up, the Blue Frog system analyzes the spam to identify not its sender, but the advertiser that uses the spam to sell his wares -- cheap Viagra tablets, for instance. These sleazy entrepreneurs put Web links in these e-mail messages, so they're easy to find.

Then Blue Frog generates a program that goes to the site's order page, and types in a message demanding an end to the e-mails. Every time a Blue Frog user gets a spam message at any of the honeypot addresses, the system automatically complains. Reshef is betting that if he can get a critical mass of 100,000 users, Blue Frog will overwhelm spam advertisers with a relentless barrage of complaints, eventually driving them right off the Internet.

It sounds deliciously nasty. But in the view of expert spam warriors, it's a lousy idea, and perhaps even illegal. ''How the heck he got funding for this is a mystery to me," said Anne Mitchell, CEO of the Institute for Spam and Internet Public Policy.

More:
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/07/25/spam_block_has_its_own_ethical_issues/





The Do Not Intrude™ Registry

The Do Not Intrude™ Registry puts you in charge of the spam messages you receive in the same way the national Do Not Call Registry gives you a choice about receiving telemarketing calls.

Rather than waiting for spam to arrive and then trying to filter it out, Blue Security’s bold innovative approach actively deters spammers from sending unsolicited e-mail to your mailbox.

With the Do Not Intrude Registry you no longer have to worry about personal messages going to your Junk e-Mail folder, while spam messages continue to flood your Inbox, wasting your time and creating a hostile computing environment that exposes you to offensive content and raises security hazards.

Active Deterrence™

The Do Not Intrude Registry is enforced by the Blue Community and uses Blue Security's Active Deterrence, a patent- pending technology that disrupts the business of merchants, advertisers and spammers who choose to ignore the Do Not Intrude Registry.

For those spammers who ignore the Do Not Intrude Registry, Blue Community members use Blue Security’s visible source Blue Frog client software to automatically send complaints to the advertised Web site about the spam messages reaching their mailboxes.

Due to the sheer number of concurrent complaints from Blue Community members, non-complying spamvertised sites become overloaded, and are unable to respond to customers. As a result revenues sharply decline and both merchants and the spammers they employ are obliged to comply with the Do Not Intrude Registry to stay in business.

Active Deterrence is an ethical solution to spam. The Community reacts to spam it receives and warns advertisers and spammers before posting complaints on their sites. Merchants and spammers can easily avoid the consequences of Active Deterrence by using a simple set of Registry Compliance tools that removes addresses that appear in the Do Not Intrude Registry from their mailing lists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC