Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Debate That Wasn't

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:25 AM
Original message
The Debate That Wasn't
The Debate That Wasn't
By Joshua Holland, AlterNet
Posted on August 1, 2005

One would hope that citizens of a wealthy, vibrant democracy could be
moved to openly debate issues of vital national importance. A case in
point is an issue as fundamental as shifting our economy from creating and selling manufactured goods to one that provides services in a global marketplace. Such a sea change would surely leave millions of skilled workers adrift; you'd think they would like to have a say.

But this is the United States, and that debate is, unfortunately,
buried beneath a ton of rhetoric -- mostly industry-funded nonsense
that made the "transition" as smooth as possible for corporate movers
and shakers.

For believers in unfettered "free" markets, it is simply a matter of
faith that the logic of the private sector will eventually lead to
greater prosperity for all, even if some are steam-rolled in the
process.

Job displacement and economic insecurity are simply the results of
increased productivity, technological advances and the availability of cheaper labor overseas -- all part of the Natural Order of Things and a consequence of economic progress that is to be embraced rather than questioned. The belief is immune to contradictory data, and its
adherents have little patience for dissent, and they have the budgets
to render it irrelevant anyway.

....

http://www.alternet.org/story/23581/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateboomer Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. What's left out of the globalization debate
is that although capital can move anywhere it wants, labor(which is the wealth of the great majority of the world population) doesn't have mobility. Governments and corporations still want control. Free markets are structured only for those whose wealth is mostly unearned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Calling it a "free" market is a particularly vicious joke
Only those with a great deal of money can buy into it. Only they can participate in any real way in its vaunted privilege of "choice". The rest of us are merely part of its mechanism, employed to generate profit for the few. It is not "free" for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC