Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kicking the AP's Ass, plus KO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:27 AM
Original message
Kicking the AP's Ass, plus KO
Ok, this is what I wrote on my blog in full.-Bill

This is what I wrote to the Associated Press about their use of jingoistic terms and warmongering rhetoric with regards to the protests in Crawford, TX, where our fearless Recreationist-In-Chief has promptly set the record for laziest president ever besting the formidably lazy Ronald Reagan by over three years. Well, everybody has to be good at something right?

Here is my e-mail to the AP, plus the attached article, I am referring to. Now, I should say this, the bottom line here is that spouting slogans and jingoistic talking points isn't being patriotic, it's being a sheep. Sheep are trained to follow and do what they are told. No questions asked. That isn't patriotic, that's being stupid. I will also attach an opinion piece written by Keith Olbermann of MSNBC for more info on lies and jingoism. Limbaugh runs away from Limbaugh (Keith Olbermann) http://www.bloggermann.com/

What matters here is that being "pro-war" doesn't mean you have the market cornered on patriotism. It just means like everybody else you are entitled to your opinion. Speaking up and out, in and of itself is pretty patriotic, be it support or dissent. But, blindly going forward in support of a folly is dangerous territory my friends. This isn't a George Orwell novel or 1930's Germany that we're living in. It's the United States of America. And, we have some serious issues going on, that require serious questions to be answered in a pretty serious fashion. So you can be a sheep or you can be a patriot. Which one are you? I don't know, I just report.

You decide.

Subject: About the words "anti-war" and "patriotic"

I object to the AP calling the pro-war group the showed up in Crawford "patriotic" and the Cindy Sheehan affiliated group simply "anti-war." It's a slap in the face of veterans and the parent's who have lost children in a war to make this dismissive, condescending correlation. The people who blindly support this President's folly, which according to polls are not the majority of this country, are not "patriotic." They're foolish, if anything.

So would you call Chuck Hagel "anti-war" because he has serious critiques of the Iraq war? Or Paul Hackett? For that matter would you suggest that Russ Feingold isn't patriotic because he voted his conscience in the run up to the Iraq War and speaks that conscience to this very day? I doubt it.

Would you call that lunatic who mowed down the crosses at Camp Casey a "patriot" because he is avidly pro-war and pro-Bush? I hope not.

If you're going to call that camp anything, just call them "pro-war" or "warmongers" because the term "patriotic" should be reserved for the people demonstrating on the other side of the issue in Crawford. Camp Casey is all about patriotism. That should be recognized.

http://famulus.msnbc.com/famulusgen/ap08-20-190030.asp?t=apnew&vts=82020051958#body

If you want to read more of my stuff here is the link:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/billwetzel/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. wondered where you'd wandered
good read, thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. glad you liked it
just getting back to school, so I've been busy the last few days etc. I'll still be around though. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illbill Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good report Bill
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 06:03 AM by illbill
The way the media, especially nationally syndicated media, characterize people is important. You are right on the money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Has anyone checked to see if Editor & Publisher has covered this? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC