Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Miers the anonymous "CIA briefer" who read the 8/6/01 PDB to Bush?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 11:49 AM
Original message
Is Miers the anonymous "CIA briefer" who read the 8/6/01 PDB to Bush?
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 11:52 AM by leveymg
Editor & Publisher picked up on a report in the LA Times that Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers was the briefer who read the notorious August 8, 2001 CIA Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) to President Bush. That is startling news in itself, considering that she's also W's lawyer and advised him about the handling of 9/11 after the attacks.

Here's another unexploded bombshell. Up until now, it has been reported that Bush reviewed the Top Secret PDB with an anomymous "CIA briefer."

This raises a few new questions:

Is Harriet Miers an employee or operative of the Central Intelligence Agency? Or, did someone else in the room read the document to Bush, while Ms. Miers listened? What did she advise the President to do, both before and after 9/11, about the terrorist attack? What, if anything, will Senators ask her about this subject?


Here's the E&P story:

Miers Briefed Bush on Famous Bin Laden Memo, But Newspapers Handle the AP Photo Quite Differently

By E&P Staff

Published: October 04, 2005 10:45 AM ET


NEW YORK On its front page today, The New York Times publishes a photo of new U.S. Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers going over a briefing paper with President George W. Bush at his Crawford ranch, “in August 2001,” the caption reads. USA Today and the Boston Globe carried the photo labeled simply “2001,” but many other newspapers ran the picture in print or on the Web with a more precise date: August 6, 2001.

Does that date sound familiar? Indeed, that was the date, a little over a month before 9/11, that President Bush was briefed on the now-famous “PDB” that declared that Osama Bin Laden was “determined” to attack the U.S. homeland, perhaps with hijacked planes. But does that mean that Miers had anything to do with that briefing?

As it turns out, yes, according to today's Los Angeles Times. An article by Richard A. Serrano and Scott Gold observes that early in the Bush presidency “Miers assumed such an insider role that in 2001 it was she who handed Bush the crucial 'presidential daily briefing' hinting at terrorist plots against America just a month before the Sept. 11 attacks.”

So the August 6 photo may show this historic moment, though quite possibly not . . . Two others in the background are Deputy Chief of Staff Joe Hagin and Steve Biegun of the national security staff."

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001221205






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. So did she have a top secret security clearance?
She wasn't the chief WH counsel then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds about right..
.. Bush gives great jobs to anybody who can implicate him. Anybody involved in the criminal acts is either promoted or given a medal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. By George, I think you've got it!
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 12:06 PM by EST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wait til Sibel Edmonds' case reaches SCOTUS
I wonder how Miers will rule on that one? Or will she recuse herself?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. My guess is that O'Connor will still be on the court then...
I think they decide whether to hear her case or not within the next couple of weeks before they go into session again. I doubt that the Dems will let this nomination go through that quickly. Bush might be trying to "beat the clock" on this one, but I would hope that Dems (assuming that they aren't in BIG trouble with Edmonds' testimony as well) will be sensitive to this and make sure that Edmonds' case is heard before O'Connor gets replaced. O'Connor might be the wild card that helps it go to Edmonds' favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. So, she's Bush's** Rosemary Woods? ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC