Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Letter from Fitzgerald- He thought Libby left Miller hanging on purpose

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:30 PM
Original message
Letter from Fitzgerald- He thought Libby left Miller hanging on purpose
Prosecutor Thought Libby Deliberately Failed To Intervene On Reporter's Behalf
snip>
....
"I had assumed that Mr. Libby had simply decided that encouraging Ms. Miller to testify was not in his best interest," Mr. Fitzgerald wrote. He also noted press accounts that suggested that Ms. Miller and her attorneys were not satisfied with the generic written waiver that Mr. Libby had signed. The prosecutor said his conclusion was also supported by the fact that Mr. Libby had apparently not reached out to Ms. Miller, despite the fact that several congressmen called on the White House aide to make such an effort.
....
"It may be," the prosecutor surmised, "that Ms. Miller remains in jail because of a misunderstanding."

"I wish to make certain that you understand that if Mr. Libby maintains his waiver is valid and he wishes to communicate that fact either through you or directly to Ms. Miller or her counsel (without discussing the substance of what her testimony might be), I would not view such a communication as obstruction," Mr. Fitzgerald wrote. The prosecutor said he couldn't force Mr. Libby to contact Ms. Miller, but said if he did not, it implied "he would prefer that the status quo continue and Ms. Miller remain in jail rather than testify about their conversations."
....
While Mr. Fitzgerald admonished Mr. Libby not to discuss with Mr. Miller the substance of her testimony, a letter Mr. Libby sent to Ms. Miller on September 15 did mention what other reporters have said about their contact with the White House aide. "The public report of every other reporter's testimony makes clear they did not discuss Ms. Plame's name or identity with me or knew about her before our call," Mr. Libby wrote. "I believed a year ago, as now, that testimony by all will benefit all."

http://www.nysun.com/article/20936
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. So this looks like Obstructive Justice charge for Libby or
Miller... and its pointing more and more tooo Libby!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. so........
Libby let Miller think for a year that his waiver was no good, and then as the Grand Jury is finished he says "Oh---she always HAD a waiver."

Is that the story?

Or is the story that Libby and Miller concocted this whole ruse in order to protect Libby or someone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. How Do We Know
that this letter is for real? Given the tight ship Fitzgerald runs, I'd like to know how they got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here's some analysis of the letter
This first point was my take, too...

snipped from "Scooter, You're So Screwed">
...Libby is telling Judy what she can safely say. In direct contravention to what Fitzgerald communicated was acceptable without being coercive. This totally strengthens any case Fitzgerald may have already had against Libby.

Whoever had access to this letter also had access to Libby's letter. Whoever leaked the Libby/Judy letter was trying to fuck Libby. Further, whoever leaked this letter was trying to make sure it is publicly known that Libby is fucked.

The letter must've come from Tate's office -- as I've speculated the other leaked letters did. Fitzgerald was the only other party who would have had this particular letter, and his silence throughout -- which has provoked this Treasure of the Sierra Madre-like activity between the TraitorGate players -- means he most certainly did not leak this. And Tate is not trying to stab his own client. But WTF is up in his firm?

Reddhedd read the letter over too, and what jumped out at her was the fact that Libby's waiver on January 5, 2004 was presented to him by the FBI, and not by White House personnel. What Fitzgerald seems to be saying is that any claim by Libby to Miller that his waiver was coerced by his employer was therefore bullshit.

there's more.....

http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/2005_10_02_firedoglake_archive.html#112848723778728954
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. hmmm, the plot thickens ...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. hmmm, the plot thickens ...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. hmmm, the plot thickens ...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC