Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Decoding Miers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Nightwing Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:52 AM
Original message
Decoding Miers
Here's an excellent op-ed by The Washington Post's Richard Cohen regarding *, Miers and abortion. This lady scares me and should NOT be confirmed in any way, shape or form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

...A careful reading of the White House transcript from the president's recent news conference strongly suggests that Bush will not discuss abortion while sitting down, but might while standing up. Let's go to what Bush said when he was asked whether, over the course of his long friendship with Harriet Miers, he had ever discussed abortion with her: "Not to my recollection have I ever sat down with her."

<snip>

There is, however, another possibility: code. It's conceivable that Bush and Miers developed a secret language for talking about abortion. For instance, when vetting judicial appointees, Bush might have asked, "Is he pro-banana or anti-banana?" Miers would then look around, point to the walls (which have ears even in the White House) and say, "anti-banana." Then she would take another file from the pile marked "anti-banana" and recommend that person to the bench. Bush, knowing the code, might then ask, "Where does he stand on late-term bananas," or "bananas on demand?" or something really clever like that. Maybe this code was developed by George Tenet, late of the CIA and the recipient of a presidential medal for getting nearly everything wrong about Iraq. The CIA knows some dandy codes.

The clever use of code words or the ability to stand for a long time while discussing abortion might seem far-fetched, but there is no other way to explain the assurances that the very important James C. Dobson has offered his fellow conservative Christians regarding Miers. "When you know some of the things that I know -- that I probably shouldn't know -- you will understand why I have said, with fear and trepidation, that Harriet Miers will be a good justice," he told his radio listeners. Then, referring to aborted fetuses, he added, "If I have made a mistake here, I will never forget the blood of those babies that will die will be on my hands to some degree." So said the founder of Focus on the Family about a Supreme Court nominee who has none at all.

Deconstructing what Dobson has said, it's clear he has received assurances that Miers is not only antiabortion -- that's a given -- but that she will smite Roe v. Wade when she can. Dobson said he has not talked to the president about this, but he has talked with Karl Rove. Whatever the case, Dobson seems to know something that even the president pretends he does not know -- and, of course, is not known to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, either. What's more, you can bet that when the senators ask, they will be told by Miers that she cannot answer because the issue is likely to come before the court. (Also, she will be sitting down.) All of this is a ridiculous charade. The president makes the abundantly unqualified Miers seem even more unqualified -- a clerk of some sort with whom he would never discuss weighty matters. It is all a soft lie, an odd folkway of this place called "inside the Beltway," where everyone talks in code and no one ever says what they mean. This odd recourse to feints and fibs demeans the process by which the nation's most important judges are selected. What Harry Golden would make of this, we will never know, but I'd like to think he'd dust off his old plan and tell the president to just sit down. That way, the truth may come to him.

Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/10/AR2005101001225.html?nav=hcmodule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's why it's imperative to impeach bush before he ruins the SCOTUS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC