Harriet Miers's nomination to the United States Supreme Court is a debacle. For starters, contrary to the current administration's belief, her religion is not a sufficient basis for her nomination to the Court. At the very least, such a litmus test violates the Constitution ("no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust." Art. 6).
More importantly, however, the woman just ain't that bright.
Of all the words recently written about Harriet Miers, none are more disturbing than the ones she wrote herself. David Brooks, of the New York Times, upon reviewing her opinions in the Texas Bar Journal, explains that:
"I don't know if by mere quotation I can fully convey the relentless march of vapid abstractions that mark Miers's prose and throw aside ideology. Surely the threshold skill required of a Supreme Court justice is the ability to write clearly and argue incisively. Miers's columns provide no evidence of that."
In fact, members of the haughty, conservative Federalist Society are reportedly ready to "launch a coup" at the prospect of Miers joining the Court. As one Happy Friday victim reported, even Ann Coulter -- none too bright herself but capable of at least constructing a sentence in between make-overs -- is outraged at the current administration's attempt to "dumb down America" all the way to the Supreme Court. Apparently, liberal elitism (defined as the desire to have smart people doing important jobs like running the nation and protecting the free world) has its merits when the third branch of government is threatened.
Obviously, the current administration wants to nominate a woman after they failed to do so to replace Justice O'Connor; the first woman ever appointed to the Court. And, again obviously, the current administration wants a nominee who subscribes to their reactionary ideology (anti-evolution, anti-abortion, anti-education, anti-environment, anti-separation of church and state, and oh yeah, pro-guns). But, is Harriet Miers the best they can do?
Surely, there exists somewhere a highly intelligent, female legal scholar deserving of a seat on the nation's highest court who also shares such ideals. Then again, perhaps the problem is no highly intelligent, female legal scholar deserving of a seat on the nation's highest court could share in such thinking.
Perhaps, in that regard, Miers is the best they can do...
http://happyfriday2008.blogspot.com/