Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Large-Scale Role for U.S. Military in Disasters Described As 'Inevitable'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:08 AM
Original message
Large-Scale Role for U.S. Military in Disasters Described As 'Inevitable'
Large-Scale Role for U.S. Military in Disasters Described As 'Inevitable'
2005-10-15
Buffalo News


By Ann Scott Tyson

The U.S. military is planning a more rapid, robust role for active-duty forces in responding to catastrophic disasters or terrorist attacks, a senior Pentagon official said Wednesday, describing the demand for large-scale military resources in such cases as "inevitable."

Paul McHale, assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense, stressed that the expanded active-duty military response would be limited to rare, mass calamities or attacks in which thousands of lives were at risk -- such as a category 4 hurricane, or a terrorist strike involving chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.

Federal troops also might play a role in enforcing a quarantine in the case of a pandemic outbreak of avian flu or other disease, McHale said, although initially that job would fall to National Guard forces under the command of a state governor.

"We are looking at a wide range of contingencies potentially involving Title 10 forces if a pandemic outbreak of a biological threat were to occur," said McHale, who planned further review of avian flu quarantine measures.


snip


http://www.blackenterprise.com/yb/ybopen.asp?section=ybng&story_id=84144435&ID=blackenterprise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sure, what's so bad about MARTIAL LAW for America?
I mean hey, tanks in our streets, troops shooting fellow citizens.

I hope YOU get a Lyndie England guarding your home. :)

RAH RAH RAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Fuck That
Edited on Sat Oct-15-05 11:32 AM by Tace
"The general voice from north to south... calls for a bill of rights. It seems pretty generally understood that this should go to juries, habeas corpus, standing armies, printing, religion and monopolies. I conceive there may be difficulty in finding general modifications of these suited to the habits of all the States. But if such cannot be found, then it is better to establish trials by jury, the right of habeas corpus, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, in all cases, and to abolish standing armies in time of peace, and monopolies in all cases, than not to do it in any. The few cases wherein these things may do evil cannot be weighed against the multitude wherein the want of them will do evil." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1788.

"It astonishes me to find... of our countrymen... should be contented to live under a system which leaves to their governors the power of taking from them the trial by jury in civil cases, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of commerce, the habeas corpus laws, and of yoking them with a standing army. This is a degeneracy in the principles of liberty... which I (would not have expected for at least) four centuries." --Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, 1788. (*) FE 5:3

http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff0950.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Meanwhile the Dems are sleeping, once again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC