Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O'Connor Calls for Clearer Detainee Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 03:28 AM
Original message
O'Connor Calls for Clearer Detainee Rules
WEST POINT, N.Y. (AP) - Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on Thursday spoke out for clearer and more high-minded rules governing the detention and interrogation of prisoners in the war on terrorism.

Addressing cadets at West Point, O'Connor said incidents from Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba have shown confusion among soldiers and the need for guidance.

While the Supreme Court has ruled that prisoners should have a meaningful opportunity to challenge indefinite detention, O'Connor said the court should not and cannot give broad answers to policy questions.

The president and Congress have done little to date to clarify the situation, she said.

more...

http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/bw-scotus/2005/oct/20/102006762.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beingthere Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. interesting because
whatever her career on the Court amounted to or how history will view it, now that she's reached the age she has and retired from the top job she's had, she can say exactly what she thinks and not give a fuck what anyone thinks about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why Doesn't She Insist on the Rule of Law?
There is no such thing as "detainee", and there's no compelling reason to let Bush create this class of people, either, even if he had the authority to do so, which he doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. If she wasn't retiring, her opinion would matter....
as it is, she's made herself irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC