Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT Bombshell from Bill Keller re Judy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Chalco Donating Member (817 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 04:40 PM
Original message
NYT Bombshell from Bill Keller re Judy

This just out. Bill Keller angry at Judy.

snip

"I wish we had dealt with the controversy over our coverage of WMD as soon as I became executive editor."

snip

"So it was a year before we got around to really dealing with the controversy. At that point, we published a long editors' note acknowledging the prewar journalistic lapses, and -- to my mind, at least as important - - we intensified aggressive reporting aimed at exposing the way bad or manipulated intelligence had fed the drive to war. "

snip

"I wish that when I learned Judy Miller had been subpoenaed as a witness in the leak investigation, I had sat her down for a thorough debriefing, and followed up with some reporting of my own. It is a natural and proper instinct to defend reporters when the government seeks to interfere in our work. And under other circumstances it might have been fine to entrust the details -- the substance of the confidential interviews, the notes -- to lawyers who would be handling the case. But in this case I missed what should have been significant alarm bells. Until Fitzgerald came after her, I didn't know that Judy had been one of the reporters on the receiving end of the anti-Wilson whisper campaign. I should have wondered why I was learning this from the special counsel, a year after the fact. (In November of 2003 Phil Taubman tried to ascertain whether any of our correspondents had been offered similar leaks. As we reported last Sunday, Judy seems to have misled Phil Taubman about the extent of her involvement.) This alone should have been enough to make me probe deeper."

More here http://www.crooksandliars.com/stories/2005/10/21/aMessageFromBillKeller.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bill Keller is still being coy, now he feigns "anger" give it up Bill
YOU KNEW TOO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. So Judee Judee mislead Keller the same
way old Tenent mislead the Chimperor...right?

bullshit

CYA time Bill - too late
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. not sorry, Bill, just sorry you and missWMD got CAUGHT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. "This alone should have been enough to make me probe deeper."
Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa...yea right, Billy boy. More like me a cowboy, me a cowboy, me a lazyass owboy.

When you fail to do your job, you should take the hit, hard. Just like any other schmuck. Ya fired!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. standard CYA
damn I'm disgusted with this . "The Paper of Obfuscation"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rufus T. Firefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. The fire her.
She was factually dishonest and kept the truth from you. Why is she still employed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rest assured..

The mainstream media will use all their toadying and licking-up to Chimpco as an excuse to give a Democratic Administration NO SLACK at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. " It is a natural and proper...
...instinct to defend reporters when the government seeks to interfere in our work."

It is a natural and improper instinct of neocon shills posing as journalists to continue to distort the truth and deflect blame when exposed and caught in a web of their own lies. Judy Miller was doing the government's work---the work of propaganda dissemination to build public support for the illegal invasion of Iraq. The NYT was at best complicit and at worst a willing co-conspirator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. next step his resignation since he is taking responsibility for being
such poor leader/manager?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chalco Donating Member (817 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. kick. I think this article is important. I know he's
late to the game but he does provide some useful information, ie that Judy WAS shilling for Cheney/Libby. That's awesome info to hear from the source instead of us all assuming it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Judy WAS shilling for Cheney/Libby. It's time for the Times to show Judy
The Door
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. To little to late. The Times have let all of us down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Gee, he doesn't mention Sulzberger's role in the lying, I wonder why? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC