Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitz’s Knuckle Ball

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:18 PM
Original message
Fitz’s Knuckle Ball
(link posted within another thread by DU'er ray of light - but deserves its own thread)

The indictment of “Scooter” Libby, ONLY Scooter Libby, and ONLY on investigation- related charges (perjury, obstruction of justice, lying to investigators), is bound to be misinterpreted (read: spun), by ideologues on both sides of the political spectrum. Lefties (in addition to being disappointed that their favorite bête noire, Karl Rove, has seemingly evaded the prosecutor's net) will feel like some of the wind has been knocked out of their sails because no crime was charged in connection with the underlying revelation of Valerie Plame's identity (a key element in their assertion that such revelation was motivated by the need to discredit a vocal critic of administration's casus belli for the war--Iraq's possession or acquisition of nuclear weapons capability). And righties will revel in that same fact (i.e., since no crime was committed by the Plame outing, the outing was nothing more than a legitimate defense against the attack on the motivation for the war--in other words, politics as usual).

But, to continue Patrick Fitzgerald's somewhat tortured baseball analogy, there is no reason either for joy or sorrow in Mudville. Mighty Casey (a/k/a Fitzgerald) has, in essence, taken a base on balls, four (or, in Libby's case, five) lousy pitches, none of which he could really swing at, much less hit out of the park. And, just like a base on balls does't count as an at-bat, in some ways Fitz still hasn't stepped up to the plate. But, I suggest that what he may have done is to cork a bat for his next up.

Yesterday's indictment was dictated by time more than anything else. With the grand jury's term expiring today, if any indictment was going to be returned, this was the day, and I, for one, don't question Fitzgerald's statement that Libby's obstruction of the investigation prevented him from getting to the truth about the so-called “underlying” charges (e.g., those associated with outing a CIA operative). Indeed, the obstruction charged against Libby prevented the prosecutor from furnishing the one element of the underlying crimes that may be the most difficult to prove: mens rea, as it's known in the criminal law (i.e., a culpable state of mind). But, be assured: the last out in this game is still to come, and the indictment is a shot across the bow for a whole host of characters in this unfolding drama that should indicate to them sighs of relief would be premature.

First, we know that Fitz intends to continue the investigation, albeit with a new grand jury. That's no big deal, since the evidence that was presented to the first grand jury will be available, word-for-word and page-for-page, to the next one for their examination and, if necessary, for further elaboration or elucidation either by the prosecutor or by additional witnesses. In other words, the new grand jury won't be starting from scratch---not by a long shot.

much more: http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2005/10/29/20254/872


dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bravo! This gives more hope for the situation, imo.
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 09:41 PM by vickiss
The fact that Fitzgerald had requested the info before on the forged documents and WHIG ( am I remembering that correctly?) are very encouraging. Fingers still crossed, and toes and eyes.

Thanks dweller.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've read in another article..
that because of Libby's lies and deceit, it was like throwing dirt in the umpire's (Fitzgeralds) face. In other words, Fitz couldn't get the facts on the case because of Libby, not because there was no wrongdoing by the scum in the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. What other charges had he been digging into?
...prevented him from getting to the truth about the so-called "underlying" charges (e.g., those associated with outing a CIA operative).

I had thought he was investigating only the leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. He can use the Leak as a Fuse
and explode the whole shooting match. Or as a clue to the center of the Labyrinth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. As I Understand It
Fitzgerald picked the most obvious, impossible to defend or disprove crimes on the weakest of the centrally placed members of the cabal. Perhaps he hopes to squeeze Scooter into co-operating with a plea-bargain, or by making an example of him, convince other little birds in the bushes (aw, ain't that too cute for words!) to sing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC