Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krauthammer: Science, religion are not enemies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
billr Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 10:37 PM
Original message
Krauthammer: Science, religion are not enemies

Great one, even if you seldom agree with Krauthammer....


By CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER

Because every few years this country, in its infinite tolerance, insists on hearing yet another appeal of the Scopes monkey trial, I feel obliged to point out what would otherwise be superfluous - that the two greatest scientists in the history of our species, Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein, were both religious.
Newton's religiosity was traditional. He was a firm believer in Christianity and a member of the Church of England. Einstein's was a more diffuse belief in a deity who set the rules for everything that occurs in the universe.

Neither saw science as an enemy of religion. On the contrary. "He believed he was doing God's work," wrote James Gleick in his recent biography of Newton. Einstein saw his entire vocation - understanding the workings of the universe - as an attempt to understand the mind of God.


http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20051118/1024724.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
occuserpens Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is only small part of the story
Check complete analysis at http://tinyurl.com/c5wau
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Einstein was not religious in any conventional sense
Edited on Fri Nov-18-05 11:09 PM by Sandpiper
And certainly not in the Judeo-Christian sense of the word.


Einstein did not believe in a personal God or in the existence of an immortal soul in human beings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
occuserpens Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sure
Krauthammer would not be Ktauthammer without lying on something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. That's true
There's some conflicting information out there about Einstein -- one biographer even described him with a pantheistic belief, that God expresses Itself in creation, not in the lives of human beings. But no, Einstein was not religious in the conventional sense. And I don't even know if he would have described himself as a theist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. What's a matter Charles? The flat-earther's among your readers
making you a little nervous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. flat-earthers, that's a great one. I prefer Christian Taliban but if I may
I would like to throw that one in my arguments against the Taliban here in Western Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. throw it at the talibornagain - where ever you see them
and I picked up "taliboragain" here at du - use either liberally...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Of course they're enemies
In the days when religion's power and rule were absolute, the Church recognized the danger of its new, rising enemy and tried to crush it. Having failed in that, religion is trying to make friends outwardly and undermine science more deviously.

Of course rationalism and superstition are enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. bullshit. of course they are. even if they war in a single mind
like, for instance, newton's.

and for the record, einstein, as an avowed non-theist, didn't believe anything like krauthammer says he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alonzo Fyfe Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. That Depends
Whether science and religion are at odds depends on your religion.

If your religion says that the Earth sits on the back of elephants riding on a turtle, and earthquakes are caused when the turtle moves, then science says that your religion is wrong.

If your religion says that lighting is the result of Thor or Zeus getting angry and tossing lightning bolts and making thunderous noise, science is going to tell you that your religion has problems.

If your religion says that the volcano will not harm the village if you would only sacrifice a virgin to it, science is going to tell you that this is not going to help.

If your religion says that diseases are caused by the abandonment of God, and that you can cure disease by prayer rather than anti-biotics, science is going to prove that there are some holes in your theory.

If your religion tells you that the earth is the center of the solar system and that all things revolve around it, science is going to tell you that this is mistaken -- and burning the scientists that say this (or threatening to, as they are held under house arrest) will not change the facts.

If your religion says that the earth is less than 10,000 years old, and that, at the start of the earth, God created Adam and Eve and gave them life, science is going to contradict this.

There are some religions that do not compete with science. These are religions that state that God made this wonderful universe and we discover God's truth in test tubes and and particle colliders, not in bibles.

Science does give us reason to prefer some religions over others.

Some scientists want to say otherwise in the hopes of getting religion off of their back. But this only proves that even some scientists can disregard observation and fact in favor of a little wishful thinking.


Alonzo Fyfe
Atheist Ethicist Blog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC