Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney Falsely Suggests spying Could Have Prevented 9/11.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:13 PM
Original message
Cheney Falsely Suggests spying Could Have Prevented 9/11.




http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/04/cheney-911-2/
Cheney Falsely Suggests Warrantless Domestic Surveillance Could Have Prevented 9/11

This is what Vice President Cheney said this afternoon:

Another vital step the President took in the days following 9/11 was to authorize the National Security Agency to intercept a certain category of terrorist-linked international communications…If we’d been able to do this before 9/11, we might have been able to pick up on two of the hijackers who flew a jet into the Pentagon. They were in the United States, communicating with al-Qaeda associates overseas. But we didn’t know they were here plotting until it was too late.

Cheney’s claim isn’t true. Any surveillence involving known al Qaeda or affiliates could be conducted consistent with the law, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which permits domestic surveillence involving any terrorist group. On Sunday, President Bush confirmed his warrantless domestic surveillance program only targets people speaking to known al Qaeda and affliates:

The NSA program is one that listens to a few numbers, called from the outside of the United States and of known al Qaeda or affiliate people.

The problem prior to 9/11 wasn’t the law. It was a breakdown of communication. An FBI agent failed to share critical information about Zacarias Moussaoui with the Justice Department. Here’s an excerpt from the Joint Congressional Investigation into 9/11:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. and half the country will believe this dipstick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefool_wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Lets hope
its less than half, all we need it to be is less than half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The media will spread his lies
and repeat them over and over and over- just like they did about Hussien and 9-11.

35% - 40% of the sheeple will believe them without the slighest question and another 15% - 20% just won't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. I suggest Bush read his PDB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. this administration uses families grief for their own purposes--disgracefu
they have no shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefool_wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Even more so
They DID know it was going to happen and were monitoring several of those involved WITHIN THE LAW.

9/11, 9/11, 9/11, I'M TIRED OF THAT BEING THEIR EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING!

It is especially frustrating KNOWING they knew and are lying to us about everything revolving around 9/11 and since. I hope the ghosts of 3000+ dead americans haunt them until their dying day (and that's just the 9/11 ghosts I'm wishing upon them, don't get me started on the war dead).

Can I get an AMEN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. They will ride that horse until it kicks them off...
Amen, by the way.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalinNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. 9/11 = could have, should have, would have, * admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Reading the PDB might have helped
Not the Osama is determind to strike in america should raise alarm bells or any thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gary173 Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. The WaPo also proves cheney lied
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40886-2004Aug4.html

"The disclosure involved two messages that were intercepted by the National Security Agency on the eve of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks but were not translated until Sept. 12. The Arabic-language messages said "The match is about to begin" and "Tomorrow is zero hour." The Washington Post, citing senior U.S. intelligence officials, reported the same messages in its June 20, 2002, editions."

Paragraph halfway down page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. cheney thinks he's ..
Svengali and all he has to do is speak lies and the country will do his bidding. Boy, is that idiot in for a rude awakening, someday!

Btw, the bush/cheney gang could have prevented 9/11 if they had paid attention to the more than 50 warnings that were given and not to mentioned the August 6, 2001 memo bush got when he was on another vacation.

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/11/1081621819966.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. I think Cheney did more than lie.
I think he was the mastermind behind 9/11. I just have this feeling he planned it and executed the terrorist attack.

We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Have you read "Crossing The Rubicon"?
Mike Ruppert makes a pretty good case for that, mostly from reports dug out of the corporate media (where they were buried on page 35 and then forgotten).

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephen Crockett Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Cheney tied with Delay as Democratic Talk Radio's Villain of 2005
This example sure makes us glad we awarded him this year! Great article that I wish we had used in our press release.

http://66.39.111.188/cgi-bin/UltraBoard/UltraBoard.cgi?action=Read&BID=1&TID=10587&SID=298

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
War Pigs Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Dick
Cheney falsely suggests he's not an evil, fatalistic, world conquering bastard puppeteering the dumbest prick to ever almost be elected president.:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. Clinton prevented a 9/11 without bush's
kind of spying -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephen Crockett Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. Canadian article puts Cheney's comments in a historical context

Published on Sunday, January 8, 2006 by the Toronto Sun (Canada)

The 'Fin de Regime'?
An Out-of-Touch George Bush Now Presides Over a Lost Foreign War and a
Morass of Influence Peddling

by Eric Margolis

WASHINGTON -- China's Taoists philosophers warned that you become what you
hate. We see this paradox in Washington, where the current administration
increasingly reminds one of the old Soviet Union.

The U.S.S.R. went bankrupt after spending 40% of national income on the
military. President George Bush's administration will spend a staggering $419.3
billion US on the military this fiscal year. An additional $130 billion US has
been budgeted in 2006 for the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.

That's $10.8 billion a month -- 40% above previous estimates -- and somewhat
more than the monthly cost of the Vietnam War at its height. Add to this
huge sum an estimated $1.5 billion in monthly secret expenditures in Iraq and
Afghanistan by CIA and Pentagon intelligence.

Astoundingly, U.S. military spending in 2006 will equal the rest of the
world's total combined military expenditures. I just saw an ad for the new,
$115-million F-22 Raptor stealth fighter, trumpeting how its radar can "intercept
communications of insurgents." Using a $115-million aircraft to listen to
cellphone calls by a bunch of jihadis in Waziristan staggers the imagination.

Meanwhile, Moscow on the Potomac is in an uproar over government spying on
citizens, torture, and what appears to be the mother of all influence-peddling
scandals. Revelations that the super-secret National Security Agency and FBI
have been monitoring domestic as well as international telecommunications
have roused even the deadheads in Congress and the lapdog media. FBI agents are
reportedly spying on such nefarious "terrorists" as vegetarians and animal
rights activists.

Bush (shades of Leonid Brezhnev) claims the right to override any laws
because the U.S. is at war. "Terrorists" ("enemies of the state" in Soviet talk)
threaten the U.S., so anything goes. What next -- cancelling next fall's
elections because of the threat of the phantom al-Qaida?

Meanwhile, a scandal bursts right out of the last days of the corrupt Soviet
Union. A sinister Republican apparatchik named Jack Abramoff has admitted
dishing out $4.4 million in bribes to senators, congressmen and political aides.
Bigwigs like Bush, House Speaker Dennis Hastert, Republican grand poobah Tom
DeLay, Bible-thumping crusader Ralph Reed, Hillary Clinton and a bevy of
venal legislators have been implicated in this culture of corruption.


Abramoff got over $30 million from various Indian tribes promoting their
casino businesses. He and cronies scalped their Indian clients, pocketing $11
million in kickbacks. Where, one wonders with awe, did those persecuted native
Americans find so much cash?

Republicans (and also some Democrats) are scared silly by the scandal. Many
legislators may be headed for the big house.

All parties that stay in power too long become deeply corrupt. Wise voters
need to kick out incumbents regularly. Longevity in office ensures bad
government. The Republicans, buoyed by faked-up war fever, became deeply corrupted
more quickly than usual.

The Achilles heel

Money is the Achilles heel of democracy. In America, winning and keeping
office demands spending huge sums on TV advertising. The Washington lobbyists
and bagmen who produce millions to fund politicians have become more powerful
than elected legislators. This is how parasites like Abramoff flourish.

A smell of "fin du regime" hangs over Washington, just as it did over the
last days of decaying Soviet oligarchy. An out-of-touch leader presides over a
lost foreign war and a morass of influence peddling and bribery, as the secret
police struggle to keep a lid on growing dissent.

© 2006 Toronto Sun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC