Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pravda: Condoleezza Rice's anti-Russian stance based on sexual problems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 01:55 PM
Original message
Pravda: Condoleezza Rice's anti-Russian stance based on sexual problems
The US Secretary of State released a coarse anti-Russian statement. This is because she is a single woman who has no children

(snip)

According to Condoleezza Rice, Russia's actions towards Ukraine did not characterize it as a respectable member of the Group of Eight. The statement from the high-ranking US official sounded like a reprimand from a strict babysitter that was teaching its baby to behave.

(snip)

"Such women are very rough. They are all workaholics, public workaholics. They can be happy only when they are talked and written about everywhere: "Oh, Condoleezza, what a remarkable woman, what a charming Afro-American lady! How well she can play the piano and speak Russian! What a courageous, tough and strong female she is!

"This is the only way to satisfy her needs of a female. She derives pleasure from it. If she has no man by her side at her age, he will never appear. Even if she had a whole selection of men to choose from she would stay single because her soul and heart have hardened. Like Napoleon, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane, or Alexander the Great of Macedon Ms. Rice needs to fight and release tough public statements in global scale. She needs to be on top of the world.

(snip)

"Condoleezza Rice needs a company of soldiers. She needs to be taken to barracks where she would be satisfied. On the other hand, she can hardly be satisfied because of her age. This is a complex. She needs to return to her university and teach students there. She could also deal with psychological analysis.

more…
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/redir.php?jid=4f9e4353942f5ad9&cat=723971d98160d438
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. She's a dominatrix, that's all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Here's the famous outfit:
Edited on Wed Jan-11-06 02:04 PM by CottonBear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. OMG, I am dying laffing
this is hilarious and most likely very true

Kinda Sleezy, someone has your number!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ouch. "She needs to be taken to barracks where she would be satisfied."
"On the other hand, she can hardly be satisfied because of her age."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. sssooooooooo sexist...
...and yet pretty damn funny.

http://www.cafepress.com/scarebaby/658010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. I Dislike Condo"lie"za...
...as much as anyone, but this article strikes me as more paternalistic woman-bashing crap.

"Condoleezza Rice needs a company of soldiers. She needs to be taken to barracks where she would be satisfied. On the other hand, she can hardly be satisfied because of her age."

What a steaming pile of sexist claptrap.

She is unfit for office because she is an incompetant liar. Who knows or cares whether she is "satisfied."

Spare me Pravda...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Agreed
There is much to dis Condi for without sinking to the level of misogyny.

I'll stand behind Condi any day against such bullshit. I can't stand what she has helped do to this country, but connecting it to her unresolved need for sex is wrong. Plain wrong. Progressives are better than that...or should be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. finally, glad somebody wrote it!! Condi needs to get that bug
out of her arse-she's human and makes mistakes....biggest mistake to date is hitching her star to the karma of king george.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pravda has all the journalistic reputation of the Daily Sun these days
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah, it's down there in the gutter with
The New York Times and The Washington Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Actually it really is a tabloid mag...
All RW propaganda aside, it truly is on the level of Batboy and Bigfoot stories. Check out some of their archived stories...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. So she needs to get laid?
And who doesn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Like Cheney's testosterone has nothing to do with anything? Or
Rumsfield's? Or Putin's for that matter?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'll tell you what I think...Russia's going BushPutinist like us
and this Pravda article is much closer to the old-school Commie propaganda writing that I have seen (disclaimer: I might read a dozen Pravda articles a year, but this one REALLY sticks out as a big step backward for feldgeling Russian "journalism")

Geeesh! The last five or six paragraphs is nothing but Zhrinovsky expounding, Brezhnev-like armchair psychoanalyzing his "enemies".

Sadly, our own post-WWII Free America used to stand foresquare against such blatant propaganda masquerading as journalism.

But really...is this "article" any worse than the same shit Charlie Krauthammer does to the Enemies of the Party about eight times a year?

I think not. So much is shameful, sad, and Soviet in Imperial Amerika, now owned by the Bush Party lock stock and just about fucking barrel.

One might even argue that Russia is FOLLOWING us into reverting to Tyranny, although they are quickly outpacing us because for them the journey is so much shorter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. "she needs to be taken to a barracks and satisfied"
I agree with the sexual repression, but she seems more like a teachers pet than dominatrix, and like a real brown nose, she even sucks up to the retarded gym teacher, George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC