Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

""The Powers of War and Peace" - Berkeley Law Professor John Yoo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 04:37 PM
Original message
""The Powers of War and Peace" - Berkeley Law Professor John Yoo

Opponents of the the war in Iraq has often includes the argument that President Bush lacked the constitutional authority to wage the war. Legal scholar John Yoo wrote a secret memo to then White House counsel Alberto Gonzales which argued that the executive had the right to use military force preemptively against terrorists or nations that harbored them. In his new book, "The Powers of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs after 9/11," Yoo outlines a defense of his position and examines constitutional history and the Framers' intent for presidential power. "The Powers of War and Peace" also looks at the role of Congress in the funding the use of military forces overseas.

John Yoo , a professor at the University of California at Berkeley School of Law and former counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee, will be online Friday, Jan. 13, at 1 p.m. ET to discuss his new book, "The Powers of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs after 9/11."

<><>



Personal, nasty, editorial comment: If Dan Lungren is elected Senator in 2006 - will Bush nominate Yoo to the 9th Circuit - or maybe to SCOTUS? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Berekely?????
How in the world did this pre-Nazi clown get hired by UC Berkeley in the first place????

Were they trying to do affrimative action for believers in imperial power and the torture of children?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I only pay (very very high) CA taxes
I am not on the faculty search committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. That frozen inscrutable stare
gives me the creeps. Yoo reminds me of the Korean thug "Oddjob" in the Bond film "Goldfinger". :scared: SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. See comment
:toast: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :toast:

That's a good one - score one for you

(Like the criticism of Frist - saying he reminded the appender of the Cardiac Surgeon in Denzel Washington's "John Q")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wow, yeah,
Edited on Sat Jan-14-06 12:46 AM by Surya Gayatri
can't you just imagine all of these people as character actors in the ultimate horror movie--only this is for real? Scary, evil stuff...SG

spelling edit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. He's wrong
Edited on Sun Jan-15-06 01:11 AM by teryang
the President does not have the power to unitaterally initiate war. The UN charter precludes it. This is why Nuremberg prosecuter Benjamin Ferencz says that the Iraq war is a war crime. It was never sanctioned by the Security Council. The Charter is a a treaty that was entered into and ratified with Constitutional authority. This is why neo-cons hate the UN. Even without the charter an invasion of a sovereign state without the necessary prerequisite of a foundation of legitimate self defense remains a war crime just the same.

The fact that the Congress and the press (intimidated by a Reichstag fire event like 911 or anthrax attacks) ratified the illegal invasion by funding it, does nothing to legitimate the war or enhance the presidential power as commander in chief under the Constitution.

The notion that the executive power of the republic is enhanced to dictatorial status has no precedent in constitutional law. It is a clever but deceitful tool of straussian ideologues enamored with Michavellian ploys to maintain corporate elite dominance in a fictional republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC