Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the didn't use the FISA courts. New Technology

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 01:51 AM
Original message
Why the didn't use the FISA courts. New Technology
A year after the CALEA passed, the FBI disclosed plans to require the phone companies to build into their infrastructure the capacity to simultaneously wiretap 1 percent of all phone calls in all major U.S. cities. This would represent more than a thousandfold increase over previous levels in the number of phones that could be wiretapped. In previous years, there were only about a thousand court-ordered wiretaps in the United States per year, at the federal, state, and local levels combined. It's hard to see how the government could even employ enough judges to sign enough wiretap orders to wiretap 1 percent of all our phone calls, much less hire enough federal agents to sit and listen to all that traffic in real time. The only plausible way of processing that amount of traffic is a massive Orwellian application of automated voice recognition technology to sift through it all, searching for interesting keywords or searching for a particular speaker's voice. If the government doesn't find the target in the first 1 percent sample, the wiretaps can be shifted over to a different 1 percent until the target is found, or until everyone's phone line has been checked for subversive traffic. The FBI said they need this capacity to plan for the future. This plan sparked such outrage that it was defeated in Congress. But the mere fact that the FBI even asked for these broad powers is revealing of their agenda.

There's no way for the judicial system to approve warrants for the number of calls that the FBI wanted to monitor.

The agency could never hire enough humans to be able to monitor that many calls simultaneously, which means that they'd have to use voice recognition technology to look for "hits" that they could then follow up on with human wiretaps.

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20051220-5808.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. so, they just break the law. NO excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. & deliberately build a construct that
is impossible for compliance

Read 'Shogun' - So sorry, could not possibly comply/follow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Setting new precedents as they bounce "neocannilly" along. Like
the justice department could not have passed a new boilerplate for getting warrants. They could have passed any law at the time - oh that's right. They did.

What they don't choose to do is as informative as what they choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. I Think It Was The Targets, Not The Means
They wanted to surveille everybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktlyon Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. jam it with calls using their code words in normal conversation
Edited on Sun Jan-22-06 08:35 AM by ktlyon
talking in code will get more sophisticated
doesn't seem like a real workable plan, more like a cover for something else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC