Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The right wing's "Our Father" (Austin Chronicle)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 07:30 AM
Original message
The right wing's "Our Father" (Austin Chronicle)
Edited on Fri Jan-20-06 10:57 AM by Skinner
Prayer for the Common Man
In the religious right's new democracy, principles prescribed by man have no value in the war between heaven and hell
BY LOUIS BLACK

There is a new prayer to God above, howling up from this country out of the confusion of cheap rhetoric, meaningless polemics, and secularly driven holy visions. Longtime right-wingers and conservatives are now loudly declaring that they find nothing wrong with president-ordered wiretaps in the name of national security. "Only the enemies of this country or those with something to hide would protest," they note. "They are needed to protect us from the terrorists. Why do those protesting hate our country so much that they are determined to see the terrorists win?"...

In the thrall of traditional values and strict religious guidelines, the new right understands that strange bedfellows are unacceptable, even when politics dictate the liaison. Principles, especially as prescribed by man, have no value in the war between heaven and hell. Lifelong champions of the individual over the government have suddenly metamorphosed into presidential groupies rather than find themselves bedded with neoleftist utopians, moral-relativist Marxists, and suicidal-pacifist, chic anarchists – all masquerading as equivocating, multicultural liberals/Democrats.

This is a brand new democracy, and there just isn't room for those who don't belong. The founding fathers' organizing vision of this country as a constitutional republic is no longer accepted by the executive branch or our national legislative leaders. In their pursuit of "original intent" and judicial acquiescence (to the executive and legislative branches), they are bravely willing to go where few have gone before. In order to preserve the Constitution, they are willing to abandon it; to preserve freedom, they have the courage to cripple it...

A constitutional republic's mandate that the rights of the minority must be protected against the will of the majority is trumped by holy vision. Patriots may embrace the Constitution without actually caring about what it means. As with the Bible, the absolute word of God, it is still left to man to make the important distinctions. Thus, it is more important to focus on the exact and definitive timing of creation than it is, for example, to not charge interest on loans and forgive them if they are not repaid after seven years. When God commands "Thou shall not kill," only the most blessed of believers understand the distinctions God does not bother to delineate ("no" to killing an unborn child, "yes" to killing a criminal or nonbeliever). When in Matthew 22:39, the Lord is quoted as saying, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself," the clear meaning is "love that neighbor exactly like yourself as yourself, and damn the rest!" When asking the Lord to please "forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us," the last clause really is conditional ("those who trespass against us but are Christian," "those who trespass against us but speak English," "those who trespass against us but vote Republican").

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT

http://www.austinchronicle.com/cols_pagetwo.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. kurth:
Please be aware that DU copyright rules require that excerpts of copyrighted material be limited to four paragraphs and must include a link to the original source.

When you're copying text from the original article and skip paragraphs, a good notation to use is something line this:
paragraph

paragraph

<snip>

paragraph

<snip>

paragraph


You have one hour from the time of your original post to make changes.

In the future, please insure your posts adhere to the four paragraph standard.

TIA,

unhappycamper
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sduncang Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. WOW!
This is a grand-slam. Hope everyone gets a chance to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC