Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jonathan Alter: The Political Power of Truth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 07:00 PM
Original message
Jonathan Alter: The Political Power of Truth
I guess it just goes to show how bad things have gotten, when I'm surprised to see a journalist actually come out and say "The president lied," or that Bush's warrantless wiretapping "violates a 1978 law." (Hell, Tim Kaine can't even bring himself to say that Bush broke the law.)

The Political Power of Truth
In recent years, failure and incompetence have been trounced by fear at the ballot box. But reality may be making a comeback.

Feb. 6, 2006 issue - Strangely enough, we may look back on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2006, as the day America found its moral compass, long buried at the bottom of the national dirty-linen bag. To win the midterm elections in November, the Democrats, whose motto might as well be "So Lame for So Long," will need to make sure the country focuses on that compass. By "moral" I'm not talking just about the "culture of corruption" in Washington. I'm talking about restoring a reasonable respect for at least minimum standards of truth.

As usual, the iconic moment took place not in the capital but at the heart of the entertainment-industrial complex—in this case, "Oprah." As it happens, I had just been to a screening the night before of "Thank You for Smoking," the forthcoming movie based on the Christopher Buckley book. The story is a hilarious and gloriously politically incorrect sendup of Washington's culture of shameless spin. But the theme depressed me. The satire was all too real—more proof that "truth" and "reality" were not just pretzels to be twisted for commercial purposes but thoroughly devalued coins of the media and political realm. James Frey and Doubleday were just the latest to lie all the way to the bank.

Until Thursday. Something happened in that studio that went beyond "good TV." Such is the power of Oprah that her moment of truth seemed to shame the American public into more respect for the actual facts of a situation. As if to prove the synchronicity, there was even some truth breaking out in the White House press room at the very moment Oprah was airing live in the Midwest. Reporters were pressing President Bush hard. James Gerstenzang of the Los Angeles Times asked Bush if he subscribed to President Nixon's notion that "when the president does it, it's not illegal." This was, indeed, the essence—the truth—of the president's position on the National Security Agency's warrantless eavesdropping, which violates a 1978 law. Instead of the issue being framed in Karl Rove's phony and demagogic terms—where anyone who opposes the president's power grab doesn't want to protect us from Al Qaeda—we were edging our way toward a more accurate depiction of the controversy.

The news conference wasn't a complete truthfest. No reporter managed to ask the president about his statement of April 24, 2004, when Bush told a Buffalo audience: "Any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires—a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so." This statement was false, and Bush knew it when he said it. The president lied in Buffalo, just as surely as Bill Clinton lied when he said: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky." Of course, Bush's Buffalo lie got a tiny fraction of the airplay of Clinton's Lewinsky lie.

More...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11078876/site/newsweek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. It makes absolutely no sense.
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 08:25 PM by FrustratedDemInNC
DU can find this info in minutes yet "journalists" either refuse or ignore this simple question. The comment made on 4/24/04 should be hammered repeatedly - the silence is deafening.

The corporate media would much rather us focus on distractions while these criminals continue raping the country and shredding the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. BUSH LIED
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 09:23 PM by Martin Eden
BUSH LIED

It's a plian, simple, provable fact.

BUSH LIED

His own words, on record, are contradicted by what we know he knew at the time.

BUSH LIED

It's public knowledge, but the public isn't aware of it.

BUSH LIED

But our "free" press doesn't press the issue.

BUSH LIED

It should be shouted from every street corner, and to his face.

BUSH LIED

And I'm listening to him lie right now on television.

And it makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. and he broke the law!
Bush should be impeached!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Al Franken kept replaying through-out his entire
broadcast today. This needs to get out!

"Any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires—a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so."

"Any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires—a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so."

"Any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires—a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so."

"Any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires—a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. The other night on The Daily Show..
I saw a repeat of the one where Randy Jackson was the guest but the segment Jon did on "Oprah's world and Our world" was priceless!

He showed that clip of Ophra busting James Frey on his lying in his book that made her Book Club and wouldn't let go like a rottweiler won't let go and then he showed clips of bush, cheney, and some more lying cons and going back and forth..Jon said too bad we don't live in Ophra's world of accountability. He said it's going to be "one entertaining hour when Ophra finds out dr. phil is full of shit!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC