Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove counting heads on the Senate Judiciary Committee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:35 PM
Original message
Rove counting heads on the Senate Judiciary Committee
http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Rove2.htm

The White House has been twisting arms to ensure that no Republican member votes against President Bush in the Senate Judiciary Committee’s investigation of the administration's unauthorized wiretapping.

Congressional sources said Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove has threatened to blacklist any Republican who votes against the president. The sources said the blacklist would mean a halt in any White House political or financial support of senators running for re-election in November.

"It's hardball all the way," a senior GOP congressional aide said.

The sources said the administration has been alarmed over the damage that could result from the Senate hearings, which began on Monday, Feb. 6. They said the defection of even a handful of Republican committee members could result in a determination that the president violated the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Such a determination could lead to impeachment proceedings.


. . . more

via Huffington Post at http://www.huffingtonpost.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thats what Nixon tired and his own party turned their backs on him
lets see if history repeats itself once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Different times.. Lowell Weicker (R-Conn) kicked Nixon's ass
during the hearings. These days they are Republicans first and Americans second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
33. Good ol' Lowell...


... is making a comeback in politics. I read this past week or so he is in the process of running for US Congress once again in Conn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. If I were them I'd be asking
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 PM by ThoughtCriminal
Where do I get in line NOT to have the White House give me political support in the upcoming election? Is Rove threatening to send Bush to campign for them if they don't play ball?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, really.
Bush is the kiss of death for Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. My thoughts exactly, Nixon was reelected in a landslide.
Bush was a "wartime President" and barely squeaked by Sen. Kerry. His poll numbers have dropped considerably since then and the Abramoff scandal is shining a very ugly light on Republican campaign financing. Roves threats only work if he can separate the victim from the herd, but many Repubs are on record speaking against Bush's domestic spying.

If anything they might be worried about what Rove had on them or may be willing to make up about them. Just ask Sen. McCain about whisper campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. If fuckwad's approval ratings keep tanking myabe this threat won't have
much of an impact. Karl Rove is such a tool!:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. This from the Moonie Times, again
They've got a bizarre agenda going on over there at Washington Times land (publishers of Insight), and a prize to the first person who unearths it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Thanks.
Hadn't realized this was Wash Times affiliated.

Hidden agenda at play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdtroit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. I love this phrase: "It's hardball all the way,"
What they (GOP) refer to as hardball is what most law abiding people refer to as criminal activity.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Insight Magazine
seems "fishy". Anyways, Republican senators probabaly do not care to pose with Bush these days considering Americans do not think the country is headed in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Oh really? Do they have
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:57 PM by swag
credibility problems like Capitol Hill Blue? In my mind, the huffpost link lent some cred, but if you have info to the contrary, please give.

Thanks.

On edit: never mind - it's Washington Times affiliated. Low cred on this story.

Sorry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not that I doubt that Rove has all the NSA tapes on everyone....
but this article is weakly sourced. I need someone, ANYONE, on the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why is this pudgy f*ckwad not in jail?
Why is this TRAITOR allowed to roam free the streets of America?

Karl Rove belongs in a federal prison, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
50. Exactly. Where is that indictment when you need it?
Hope Fitz comes through soon. I'm patient, but...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. But i wonder w/ the spying does the White House have ....
..... dirt on the Senators?

Voinvich's break down yet voting to let Bolton go was really weird.

I wonder how far bush and company are in the bunker as the armies start to approach?

Or am I in my DU delusional bunker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hagel sounds like he's admitted there was a threat
coercion of a Judiciary committe vote? Wheres the Justice Dept. for that one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Fine Karl. There's no statute of limitations.
An inquiry today would not constitute double jeopardy in a few years. You're both relatively young men.

We can wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't know - isn't that bribing a public official? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Not bribing. Extortion.
Unless you were speaking tongue-in-cheek. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
49. A crime... should be prosecuted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
18. The only Republicans on the Judiciary Committee up for reelection
this year are Hatch, Kyl and DeWine. Rove shouldn't even need to threaten these guys.

His problem is with Specter and Graham -- and they are immune from Rove's threats. Graham has never been a Rove fan, not since Graham was McCain's campaign manager in SC in 2000 and Rove swiftboated McCain.

Specter's not one of Rove's boys either.

All the Democrats plus Specter and Graham could control the committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. At this point, it is hard to believe any of them will do the right thing.
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. both specter and graham were tough today. Neither buying the spin
Edited on Tue Feb-07-06 12:12 AM by emulatorloo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
31. I'm no fan of Graham either, since he wrote a bill taking away
habeus corpus, but he seems to speak his mind and it's good to see some repugs do that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. he speaks his mind--but we have been decieved by these moderate
repubs in the past many times. they seem to object then vote the party line in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. Now this is good to hear!
It's one thing to say, "You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours." but to say "You scratch my back or I'll beat the living daylights out of you" is quite something else.

It's like being part of the team, or being the waterboy. How many Repubs will decide the waterboy is the better position?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
39. looks like Hagel is concerned also--but how concerned is the question.
Some have raised doubts about Mr. Rove's strategy of painting the Democrats, who have opposed unwarranted surveillance, as being dismissive of the threat posed by al Qaeda terrorists.



"Well, I didn't like what Mr. Rove said, because it frames terrorism and the issue of terrorism and everything that goes with it, whether it's the renewal of the Patriot Act or the NSA wiretapping, in a political context," said Sen. Chuck Hagel, Nebraska Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
20. Repugs better decide whose side they're on: the Constitution's or *
Even Orrin He-atch was sounding rather middle-of-the-road tonight (MSNBC) saying there are legitimate concerns (paraphrasing). Of course, he's still one of *'s butt-boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JMDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
23. Isn't it illegal to intefere with a Senate investigation or hearing?
And wouldn't this constitute interference on a massive scale?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. good question---considering the hearing is about Rover's boss, especially
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
26. I thought this was a given? I mean, Gonzo under oath before but not now?
The writing's on the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
27. Even worse for the Whitehouse
A pissed off Judiciary committee -- even if they don't seek impeachment (which is somewhat pointless for the Senate anyway) -- can prevent just about any judicial appointment, reauthorization of the patriot act, and make the Whitehouse's life miserable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #27
44. that is, if repugs want to stand up to BushCo--doubtful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
28. Lesley Graham and Specter must be feeling the heat!!!
this is what happens when your in the middle...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Lindsey*
When I first read his name, I thought he was a girl. But I guess not....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
29. I think tubby Nazi boy just dug the Shrub his grave....
"The sources said the White House has offered to help loyalists with money and free publicity, such as appearances and photo-ops with the president."

So he's telling them that if they vote against the *, they won't get any photo ops with the 38% approval rating preznit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
32. That really would be the stupidest hing the Admin can do for itself
A previous responder questioned the credibility of this and the poster acknowledged this was washington times affiliated. It doesn't seem ilke a very strategically smart thing for the bush admin, however...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
34. nominate please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Graham is concerned about Inherent Authority (here)--wonder if Rove
will get to him?



http://thinkprogress.org/?tag=Congress

Lindsey Graham: ‘The Inherent Authority Argument…Seems To Have No Boundaries’

Lindsey Graham (R-SC) explains the danger of the administration’s legal position:

All I’m saying is the inherent authority argument in its application to me seems to have no boundaries when it comes to executive decisions in a time of war, it deals the Congress and courts out, Mr. Attorney General.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
36. "He's [Rove] lining them up one by one," --sounds like he is lining
them up against the wall. terrible image.


.Over the last few weeks, Mr. Rove has been calling in virtually every Republican on the Senate committee as well as the leadership in Congress. The sources said Mr. Rove's message has been that a vote against Mr. Bush would destroy GOP prospects in congressional elections.



"He's lining them up one by one," another congressional source said.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. "White House has offered to help loyalists with money and free publicity,"


.....Mr. Rove is leading the White House campaign to help the GOP in November�s congressional elections. The sources said the White House has offered to help loyalists with money and free publicity, such as appearances and photo-ops with the president.



Those deemed disloyal to Mr. Rove would appear on his blacklist. The sources said dozens of GOP members in the House and Senate are on that list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #37
45. maybe without Jackoff as fundraiser-in-chief & repugs wary of BushCo's
intentions, there won't be much $ in * coffers this year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
40. Meanwhile, is the DLC is making its own list, to punish attacks on Bush's
domestic spying? Vilsak's comments sound as though they were uttered by Karl himselfg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
41. Rove counting heads on the Senate Judiciary Committee
Edited on Tue Feb-07-06 08:32 AM by Pirate Smile

Rove counting heads on the Senate Judiciary Committee

The White House has been twisting arms to ensure that no Republican member votes against President Bush in the Senate Judiciary Committee’s investigation of the administration's unauthorized wiretapping.




Congressional sources said Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove has threatened to blacklist any Republican who votes against the president. The sources said the blacklist would mean a halt in any White House political or financial support of senators running for re-election in November.
"It's hardball all the way," a senior GOP congressional aide said.

The sources said the administration has been alarmed over the damage that could result from the Senate hearings, which began on Monday, Feb. 6. They said the defection of even a handful of Republican committee members could result in a determination that the president violated the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Such a determination could lead to impeachment proceedings.

Over the last few weeks, Mr. Rove has been calling in virtually every Republican on the Senate committee as well as the leadership in Congress. The sources said Mr. Rove's message has been that a vote against Mr. Bush would destroy GOP prospects in congressional elections.
"He's lining them up one by one," another congressional source said.

http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Rove2.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Isn't that Blackmail?
and should't that be investigated? Damn I wonder what wiretap goodies he has on the pukes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. What does he have on these cowards??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
46. Time to flood Senators with Faxes and phone calls. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. is there some group (website) that is organizing this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. If not, then we should.
I think we generated a lot of calls and faxes for the filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC