Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"CIA chief sacked for opposing torture"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 05:47 PM
Original message
"CIA chief sacked for opposing torture"

The Sunday Times February 12, 2006

CIA chief sacked for opposing torture
Sarah Baxter and Michael Smith, Washington

The CIA’s top counter-terrorism official was fired last week because he opposed detaining Al-Qaeda suspects in secret prisons abroad, sending them to other countries for interrogation and using forms of torture such as “water boarding”, intelligence sources have claimed.

Robert Grenier, head of the CIA counter-terrorism centre, was relieved of his post after a year in the job. One intelligence official said he was “not quite as aggressive as he might have been” in pursuing Al-Qaeda leaders and networks.

Vincent Cannistraro, a former head of counter-terrorism at the agency, said: “It is not that Grenier wasn’t aggressive enough, it is that he wasn’t ‘with the programme’. He expressed misgivings about the secret prisons in Europe and the rendition of terrorists.”

Grenier also opposed “excessive” interrogation, such as strapping suspects to boards and dunking them in water, according to Cannistraro...

Goss is believed to have blamed Grenier for allowing leaks to occur on his watch.

Since the appointment of Goss, the CIA has lost almost all its high-level directors amid considerable turmoil...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2036182,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Surprise, surprise...Porter Goss is a rubberstamp for BushCo's tyranny...
:scared: The nightmare continues... :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The only good thing
is that at least some people don't go along with the "programme". Good on them. :thumbsup:


We need more people not going along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. I will never, ever, ever, ever understand why Bob Graham
endorsed Porter Goss for that position.

SO disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Bob Graham did? You got a link for that? Given that he was one of the
very few to ask the right questions before the Iraq War--namely, if Saddam had nukes, why would he use them against us, knowing it would result in his immediate destruction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's why I was so surprised.
I don't have a link, just a memory. Graham was being interviewed on TV when Goss was nominated, and Graham said he'd worked with him on the intelligence committees and that he was a good man, or words to that effect.

I couldn't believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. recommended . . . the dossier on these clowns is approaching . . .
the size of the Oxford English Dictionary . . .

in a sane society, it would be way past time for the people to say "Enough!" -- and throw the bastards out . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC