Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Neo-Cons 4 dummies!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Eye See You Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:42 PM
Original message
Neo-Cons 4 dummies!
Tuesday, February 14, 2006
Fascism USA style.
(National Capitalism)
Two ways in achieve Fascism in America. The quick way would be a junta after a coup d é tat. You have leaders who have the militaries support and presto! You have a Fascist state! It’s been done a thousands times in South America. That is the quick method. It would never work in the USA. There would be heavy resistance due to American’s love for freedom. Then is the slow method, which is the Machiavellian method, if you present a syllogistic deception to the masses. On the face of it, you present a platform of individual liberty when you actually mean special individual liberty to a certain group or individuals. This is what the Neo-conservatives are employing here in the USA.
Here is a list of different denominations of Fascism.
1: 20th Century classic Fascism: The term, “Fascism” was first used by Benito Musolini in 1919 which came from the ancient roman symbol of power, the Fasces which means: a bundle of sticks. The bundle represented, Religion, Capitalism, Race, and The military, which was tied by the Government. Under Fascism, the Government controls business but Capitalism does exists as, “Enterprise” oppose to, “Free Enterprise”. There would be monopolies run by a few Corporations. There would be no competing businesses only a plutocracy that controls all natural resources and technology.
2:National Socialism: A racist state controlling all aspects of society. The government controls a mono-racial society where all means and productions usually under an autocracy. Religion exists but in secondary fashion. There is a classless society but has a hierarchy of elders.
3: Imperialism: One nation with the help of Corporations and the military to steal another nations wealth by force or legally.
4: Theocracy (Also known as) Christo-Fascist or Islamo-Fascist: A dictatorship by a particular religious sect.
5: National Capitalism: A combination of Classic Fascism, National Socialism, Imperialism, and Theocracy. Also known as Neo-conservatism.

What would a National Capitalist Society look like? Answer: Like a Feudal society. There would be no central government; just areas controlled by rich an Aryan man under his corporate domain. There would be pockets of Christo-Fascist zones where the extreme poor lived in debtor camps. They would be no middle Class just the multi-racial poor and the mono-racial rich. There would be a military class where most of young men would be part due to the fact there are no jobs left. Most factories are in foreign counties with slave labor.
How will National Capitalism or Corporatism be achieved?
Step 1: Take over a political party. This has already happened. The Republican Party USA leader ship has been taken over by the Neo-conservatives.
Step 2: Infiltrate and take over the military. The Neo-Cons almost achieved this goal.
Step 3:Infilitrate the secret police: There is an attempt to take over the FBI and CIA but they have been resisting.
Step 4: Control the Fundamentalist Christian movement. They have succeeded.
Step 5: Infiltrate and control the media. They almost achieve this goal. They run Fox news and A.M radio outlets. The Corporate news media has been cooperating with their war propaganda. They remain silent while the Neo-Con propagandist accuses them of being Liberal. By accusing of them of Liberalism, which fools the public, see them as a resisting alternative media when they are part of the state.
Step 6: Have fraudulent elections: This is design to fool the masses they have free elections when they don’t.
Step 7: Fake a terrorist attack. There must be an enemy, which is Arab terrorism, which was created by Neo-Cons. Blow up a building a blame it on a foreign enemy.
Step 8: Accuse their political adversaries of what they are guilty of. They accuse the left of being Fascists.
Step 9: Blame all societal problems on groups like the ACLU.
Step 10. Abolish all social programs like social Security.
Step 11: Bankrupt the U.S treasury, almost successful.
Step 12. Passive/Aggressive Racism. Use code words like:
Criminals. which means Afro-Americans.
Step 13. Start wars around the world claiming you are librating them when you actually building an empire.
Step 14. Destroy any vestige of intellectualism like universities.
Step 15. Promote positive thinking propaganda when you are responsible for negative actions. Convince the public you are compassionate when you are really misanthropic. Stay on message! Repeat the same talking point over and over again so it will sink in to the public. Accuse your opponents what you are guilty of.
Step 16: Create a threat when one does not exist. Engulf the public with fear of terrorism and epidemics of incurable diseases.
Sept 17: Accuse your target nations for conquering of making nuclear weapons. Criticize that nation of mistreating its citizens and exporting terrorism. Invade that nation and claim you are liberating it.
Final. Stage a major terrorist attack and establish material law and suspend the Constitution. Build an Empire. Take over the world and the heavens above!
Can we fight them? Yes!
How? By any means necessary!

Final thought: What the Neo-Cons are preaching is not really Libertarianism. It is Pseudo-Libertarianism. They want privatize America not for the sake of Laissez-faire capitalism but for a land grab for White racist land barons.

Join my group.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Enronscam/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's not the neocons with the economic policy fantasies...
It's the corporatists.

There's an Unholy Trinity converging in the Republican Party:

1) Neoconservatives (Cheney, Rusmfeld, Perle, etc.
2) Corporatists (Norquist types)
3) Pseudo-Christians (Frist, Coburn, DeMint and their masters like Dobson)


Put the three together and you have a recipe for the collapse of the great Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here is how they fit.
1) Neocons like Strauss decide myth should be fed to masses through religion so they don't have to be bothered with

2) Oil corporations in the USA (like the Wahabi money in the middle east) funds religion to keep people tribal and voting with petty leaders & issues like "gay" and not for real power.

3) Leaders of the mega-churches realize if they preach the talking points - they can become endless rich and powerful within their own groups. Decent and truthful pastors are marginalized in relative terms because they will not take the money and go to TV.

IMHO :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Using the faux religious was an afterthought for the neocons
They were having luck with the mighty Soviet empire until it fell apart. It wasn't until the 1992 RNC that religion was injected into the party platform with a vengeance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's when the GOP got wind of it and "they" all converted. That
year - 1992 - was when Bush Sr. lost and GOP was looking for a new machine.

Neocons had been on the religious thing in theory for years.

1992 is when neocons stopped being "crazies" and took over power from realists.

Having had ecstasy with Reagan and then loosing power to Clinton - the GOP followers would have bought into anything that promised power (especially the unlimited kind).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktlyon Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh I don't know. I think Reagan spoke of the moral majority.
The GOP has been using the religious right to do their heavy lifting for a long time. Reagan had an evangelical religious guy with him on stage many times. I can't think of his name. He is still on tv these days from time to time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. The bundle of sticks reminds me of an old fable,
a farmer had five sons who constantly fought and argued among them selves. One day after much fighting, he had them go to field and collect sticks. He challenged each son to break a stick, which was easily done. He then tied five sticks together and challenged them to break the bundle, no matter hard they tried, they could not. The moral of the story, there is strength in unity and numbers, and weakness in strife and division.

Kicked and recommended.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. #4 is what this country is now under a Theocracy. Kick and Nom #3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC