Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Chat With Novelist Alarms Environmentalists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 07:38 PM
Original message
Bush's Chat With Novelist Alarms Environmentalists
snip>
In his new book about Mr. Bush, "Rebel in Chief: Inside the Bold and Controversial Presidency of George W. Bush," Fred Barnes recalls a visit to the White House last year by Michael Crichton, whose 2004 best-selling novel, "State of Fear," suggests that global warming is an unproven theory and an overstated threat.

Mr. Barnes, who describes Mr. Bush as "a dissenter on the theory of global warming," writes that the president "avidly read" the novel and met the author after Karl Rove, his chief political adviser, arranged it. He says Mr. Bush and his guest "talked for an hour and were in near-total agreement. The visit was not made public for fear of outraging environmentalists all the more."
.....
Mr. Crichton, whose views in "State of Fear" helped him win the American Association of Petroleum Geologists' annual journalism award this month, has been a leading doubter of global warming and last September appeared before a Senate committee to argue that the supporting science was mixed, at best.

"This shows the president is more interested in science fiction than science," said Frank O'Donnell, president of Clean Air Watch, after learning of the White House meeting. Mr. O'Donnell's group monitors environmental policy. "This administration has put no limit on global warming pollution, and has consistently rebuffed any suggestion to do so," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/19/national/19warming.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's creepy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. oh God it is much worse than I have feared.
They not only reject science but accept fiction for policy!?! :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. so stupid Fred Barnes doesn't get your point either. te he
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, man. I read 'State of Fear' recently. Quit halfway when I realized...
... it was like the writings of Ayn Rand -- only not as clever and insightful. :crazy: :puke: :crazy:

:smiley denoting infantile even by Crichton's standards:

:smiley denoting chery-picking data and knocking down strawmen is not science, it's right-wing propaganda:

:smiley denoting at least the paper is recyclable:


:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. I own a copy of this jerk's book "Prey", and the ONLY reason
I have not up and f---ing BURNED the thing by now is that it was a Christmas gift from my nephew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. what every one seems to forget
Michael Crichton writes FICTION. But then the people who watch Faux, listen to Rushbo et al don't
realize they are being fed fiction most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. This proves what George seeks - proof of his delusions nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not "proof" - that would be way too high-level
I'm fumbling towards a better word . . . Reinforcement? Reassurance? Mr. Blanky?

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Barnes called * an insurgent on Bill Maher
last night. Maher kept trying to get him to say what that meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC