John Gibson's words on the UAE deal.

[Rude Horner]

I completely despise this guy from Faux news. To read his latest spewing:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185763,00.html

He's against the port deal, but not so much for the reason of safety as for the reason of what it will do to Republicans during the next elections. I love (:sarcasm:) these comments:

*****
I have thought for a long time that Republicans could survive various factors that weigh against them in November: the war, the president's approval rating, Dick Cheney's approval rating, the Abramoff scandal — whatever. But I think this is the one that really hurts because it lets Democrats run to the right of Republicans on national security.

This time large numbers of conservative Americans — Bush voters — don't think the Democrats are being foolish objecting to this deal. This isn't the NSA wiretapping controversy in which Dems looked dumb arguing for constitutional rights for terrorists.
*****

Yes, he actually does say "whatever" concerning things like the war and the Abramoff scandal. Unbelievable.

And of course, the Dems look dumb arguing for constitutional rights for terrorists. :wtf:

I wish he'd go hunting with Dick.

[babylonsister]

1. Where does one draw the line between a supposed journalist

doing something for money, as suggested recently about Brit Hume, and someone being a complete kool-aid drinker?

[Sadie5]

2. Gibson reminds me of Alfalfa

Send Gibson to the front lines in Iraq and see if he doesn't change his tune mighty quick.

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

3. ALLEGED

"And of course, the Dems look dumb arguing for constitutional rights for terrorists. "

[brooklynite]

4. Doesn't this suggest that a "fair and balanced" reporter

has a vested interest in a particular political outcome?