Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

History Lessons, By Chris Floyd

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 05:46 PM
Original message
History Lessons, By Chris Floyd
http://context.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2006/02/22/120.html

BERLIN, May 12, 2153 -- Within the ivy-covered walls of Farben University, a great battle is now raging. But although the Reich's ancient capital has seen its share of warfare down through the centuries, today's combatants have no swords, no guns, no bio-disrupters -- just words and pictures, marshaled on either side of a fierce debate that has split the academic world in two, and is beginning to spill over into politics. It all revolves around a simple question: Was the German Empire a good thing or a bad thing?

At one time, the answer would have seemed clear. In the three decades since the last "Reich Protectorate" gained its independence (Ukraine, 2122), the liberal consensus among German historians has been that the Empire founded more than 200 years ago by Adolf Hitler was largely a malign development: "a system, born in aggression and atrocity, that inflicted terrible suffering on the conquered lands for generations, and warped German society itself with its arrogance, brutality and corruption," as Germany's leading historian, Yury Vinogradov, put it in his landmark 2128 work, "Reich and Reality." That book set the tone for a flood of hard-hitting probes into Reich history that left almost no nationalist myth intact.

But in recent years, a group of conservative historians dubbed the "Revisionists" has sternly challenged this view. Led by the young Danzig firebrand Gregor Metzger, the Revisionists argue that the achievements of the Empire -- and the "Leader-State system" that was replaced by parliamentary democracy in 2120 -- have been denigrated by, in Metzger's words, "liberal apologists picking at old scabs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clara T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. From Article
"The Revisionists say such "scab-picking" is irrelevant in the modern world. "However regrettable, what's done is done," Metzger says. "What matters are the long-term benefits to civilization. One wonders if Herr Professor Vinogradov would enjoy the same kind of prosperity -- and freedom to criticize -- he possesses today if the communist evil had not been destroyed, at great sacrifice, by German power?" "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC