Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush-Blair memo shows war penciled in early

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 01:10 AM
Original message
Bush-Blair memo shows war penciled in early
Palm Beach Post Editorial

Saturday, April 01, 2006

Meeting with British Prime Minister Tony Blair on Jan. 31, 2003, President Bush suggested disguising a U.S. plane with United Nations markings and flying it over Iraq to see if Saddam Hussein would shoot at it. That doesn't sound as if Mr. Bush was trying to avoid a war.

In fact, a five-page memo on the meeting, written by a top adviser to Mr. Blair and obtained by The New York Times and others, makes it sound as though Mr. Bush had made up his mind to invade. "The start date for the military campaign was now penciled in for 10 March," the memo noted. The war began on March 19. The author, David Manning, who was at the meeting, also said it was evident that "our diplomatic strategy had to be arranged around the military planning."

Mr. Bush and Mr. Blair were concerned that U.N. inspectors had found no weapons of mass destruction. But they were concerned mostly from a public relations standpoint. They wanted some trigger to justify the invasion. That's when, the memo says, Mr. Bush suggested "flying U-2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in U.N. colours," because "if Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach."

Such an attack by Hussein could have led the U.N. to pass a second resolution specifically authorizing an invasion - a resolution Mr. Bush wanted but never got. At that Jan. 31 meeting, though, he made clear to Mr. Blair that he intended to invade even without another resolution.
<snip>

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/opinion/content/opinion/epaper/2006/04/01/m16a_bushblair_edit_0401.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. good to see this in the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. So Few Papers
said a word about this latest memo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC