Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Men Growing Up to be Boys:...a Peter Pan version of masculinity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 04:14 PM
Original message
Men Growing Up to be Boys:...a Peter Pan version of masculinity
http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2526/

Features > March 17, 2006
Men Growing Up to be Boys
Madison Avenue cultivates a Peter Pan version of masculinity
By Lakshmi Chaudhry

....

This shift in the dominant image of manhood is most evident in the evolution of the so-called “Family Man.” The benevolent patriarch of the ’50s has been replaced by an adult teenager who spends his time sneaking off to hang out with the boys, eyeing the hot chick over his wife’s shoulder, or buying cool new toys. Like a fourteen-year-old, this guy can’t be trusted with the simplest of domestic tasks, be it cooking dinner for the kids or shopping for groceries.

These pop culture images are all the more striking because they directly contradict the experiences of men in the real world. Women may still bear the greater burden of domestic work, but American males today do more at home than their fathers, and are happy doing it. According to the Families and Work Institute, the percentage of college-educated men who said they wanted to move into jobs with more responsibility fell from 68 percent to 52 percent between 1992 and 2002. A Radcliffe Public Policy Center report released in 2000 found that 70 percent of men between the ages of 21 to 39 were willing to sacrifice pay and lose promotions in exchange for a work schedule that allowed them to spend more time with their families.

Yet popular culture continues to fetishize the traditional, ’50s model of masculinity, but in a distilled form—kick-ass machismo stripped of the accompanying values of honor, duty and loyalty. We seem to have carried with us the unreconstructed sexism of the past—the objectification of women, inability to connect or communicate—but discarded its redeeming virtues. Where traditional masculinity embraced marriage, children and work as rites of passage into manhood, the 21st century version shuns them as emasculating, with the wife cast in the role of the castrating mother. The result resembles a childlike fantasy of manhood that is endowed with the perks of adulthood—money, sex, freedom—but none of its responsibilities.

....

Susan Faludi foreshadowed the rise of the metrosexual in her 1999 book, Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American Man, which describes an “ornamental culture” that tells men “manhood is displayed, not demonstrated. The internal qualities once said to embody manhood—sure-footedness, inner strength, confidence of purpose—are merchandised to men to enhance their manliness. What passes for the essence of masculinity is being extracted and bottled and sold back to men. Literally, in the case of Viagra.”
....

...By defining domestic chores literally as “homework,” the teen slacker version of masculinity offers no respite for working women struggling to balance their lives. And if adult responsibilities are defined as emasculating, then it’s no wonder that popular culture now defines “commitment” solely as a woman’s goal.

Domesticity may have always been a feminine realm, but marriage and children were once defined as integral to the traditional gender roles of both men and women. Today, it’s the woman who is cast in the role of caveman, eager to club some unsuspecting, reluctant male on his head and drag him to the altar. While progressives and feminists have rightly championed a woman’s right to reject marriage and motherhood, they rarely address the consequences of living in a culture where pair-bonding and parenting—the basic processes that form the foundation of all societies—are constructed as the antithesis of masculinity.

much more....


Lakshmi Chaudhry has been a reporter and an editor for independent publications for more than six years, and is a senior editor at In These Times, where she covers the cross-section of culture and politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a load of CRAP
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 04:27 PM by The Sushi Bandit
goes to show the sheep will belive anything. This is my manly bible!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Certainly food for thought!
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 04:32 PM by BrklynLiberal
As the mother of a grown son, I can see all the symptoms.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tod and Robert on Masculinity - A Life Less Ordinary
Tod: Do you think that I'd talk to a dog? Do you think I'd ask a dog whether you're good or evil? What do you think I am? Some kind of crazy backwoods lunatic with a barn full of human skulls and a scythe that I sharpen every day in readiness for Armageddon?

Robert: No, no, not at all, I'm sure you're just a regular kind of guy.

Tod: Right, I'm regular, I am a regular man. I want... but that's not the point! The point is, who are YOU? WHO ARE YOU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Robert and Al on compatibility in relationships
Al: Nice-looking woman.

Robert: She isn't my type.

Al: What are you talking about? Look at yourself. You're nothing. You're nobody. You're wanted in connection with a violent crime. You're cleaning the floor of a diner. She is an intelligent, passionate, beautiful, rich woman. The issue of whether or not she's your type is not one that you're likely to have to resolve in this world... or, indeed, the next, since she will be going to some heaven for glamorous pussy, and you will be cleaning the floor of a diner in hell.

Robert: I guess so.

Al: So why are you even thinking about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. And men still want war- as long as THEY don't have to fight it.
Buncha Nancy-boy wussies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bruce McAuley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Honor, Duty and Loyalty"
This is what seems to be missing, all right.
We need a school to instill these values in boys/men in a way that is rewarding to allow them to "tend the home fire" as it were, while the woman goes out scavanging and gathering.
As an old guy, I know the value of blowing on a fire to get it going! Lotta young boys have NO idea of the important things in life:
"I am a Man,
But I can change,
If I have to,
I guess"-Red Green

Finishing school for boys as they transition into manhood?
Gentle Manly Training?
Lotsa advantages to being a gentle man, women like a "good" man who would honor her, have a sense of duty to the family, and be loyal to the end.
I could sell a BUNCH of those to women I know...!
LOL

Bruce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. No wonder the divorce and unwed parenthood rates are so sky high
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 11:57 AM by StopThePendulum
Men -- and women -- need to put childish thinking behind them once they get past adolescence. By the age of 20 or 21, it's not cool anymore for a man to think like a little boy or a woman to think like a little girl. Damn right some men want the privileges of adulthood without the responsibilities. But some women have stooped to the level of childish men and have adopted what gives men a bad name, acting like wannabe studettes. I know some women who act that way; but I knew far more men who never grew up.

They're the ones who screw, have kids, and then bitch about the "kids' mom trouble" or "baby mama drama" as they put it in the ghetto, but won't lift a finger to take care of the kid they helped create.

Americans need to grow the hell up, and fast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michaelwb Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's see
It's difficult to parse this article since it is composed of not so much any real examples as media images, which is just as silly now as when Dan Quayle attacked Murphy Brown as an unwed mother, IMO.

"...getting a job, moving out of their parents’ home, getting married, and having kids..."

Let's see a housing market that has been so superheated as to be ridiculous in many urban areas combined with a depressed job market where what jobs there are, pay less adjusted for inflation than what their parents earned. Giving us the first generation in a while to do worse than their parents. And let's throw in record levels of students loans taken out to get jobs that essentially evaporated via outsourcing. That couldn't possibly be a factor....

And look at it generational ly. The WWII (or so called Greatest Generation) had the GI Bill which helped provide aid in buying first homes and getting college degrees and so enabled a large segment of Americans who marry early, have kids early, move out from their parents and get better job. In general, it bootstrapped an expanded middle class. And the 50s & 60s had strong unions and expanding economy that the current one lacks.

From that generation we get the yardstick that the current generation is measured against. Yet they operate without government help on such a scale in times of weak unions, outsourcing, economic contraction. Hardly seems fair does it? (Personally I think each generation should have an parallel of the GI Bill aimed at it, what I'm just liberal that way...)

And I always took it as a good point in feminist thought that it was dawning in women that you don't have to be married and have kids. You could make other choices or delay them and that's empowerment.

Apparently according to this article when men do it, it's narcissism. *sigh* just can't win, can one?

Mind you I moved out from my parents at 18 and have worked consistently since with no financial support from them. Which are pluses by their criteria, but sadly since I'm still still unmarried and not out there helping to populate the world with hordes of mini-mes. Which I'm kind missing the point of why I have to do that, and do it by a certain age, in such an over-populate world. Setting aside it's what my ancestors did (tradition huh well they were also into slavery, oppressing women, child labor, etc.) or invoking some sky-gods demand that we "be fruitful and multiply."

Which I guess makes me bad, huh? *rolls eyes*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC