Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DeLay's K Street buddies want their money back.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:26 PM
Original message
DeLay's K Street buddies want their money back.
(...)

An additional impetus for putting off the resignation until now was suggested by John Feehery, a former aide to DeLay and House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.). "He needed to raise money for the defense fund. That was the bottom line," Feehery said. "He wanted to make sure he could take care of himself in the court of law."

In other words, DeLay was raising money from <suckers> supporters under false pretenses. He asked contributors for financial support, telling them that he needed the money to help with his campaign, when in reality, DeLay knew he'd have to resign and he wanted the donations for his legal defense. DeLay's con is legal, but obviously dishonest.

(...)

"If I wanted to give to a legal fund, I would've done it directly," snarled one GOP lobbyist who refused to have his name attached to such callous-sounding sentiments, even if DeLay is leaving Congress.

Another lobbyist who gives to Members on both sides of the aisle said, "It's nauseating to think about" his campaign contribution going to fund DeLay's legal team. "I'm realistic about it. He wouldn't resign for no reason," this lobbyist said, noting that the timing of DeLay's departure came awfully close to the announcement of a plea agreement by his former aide Tony Rudy. "That all this money will go to the legal defense fund, it sickens me," he added. "I have to pay for that?"

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/7098.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DUHandle Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
you have to pay for it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. ROTFLMAO! Suckers!
There's one born every minute.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. wahhhhhhhhhhh--it isn't as if his lobbyist friends haven't known what a
piece of scum he is, so why are they surprised? since they were benefitting from his sneaky, underhanded and dishonest tactics, it isn't as if they have a whole lot of room for moral indignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. yes
it is only when they BENEFIT from the scum-sucking bottom-dweller that they approve - lord, what a bunch of WHORES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. It sucks when you buy a hooker
and it turns out all you're paying for is the bail money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. It couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of guys.
:rofl: Watch how Tom shakes down the suckers that give to Falwell and Robertson. He's going to cut into their take next. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Mr. Lobbyist, meet Mr. Flea."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. They knew he was up on charges when they gave the
money to his campaign, so they are just stupid...did they really think there would be charges against him if the DA couldn't make them stick? How could he stay in the race from prison? So, it's just desserts as far as I'm concerned....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Are they angry enough to testify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'd like to savor that thought.
I clicked on the Roll Call link to read more, but a subscription is required (& it's an expensive one).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC