Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hayden for CIA - Rove's Gambit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 03:46 PM
Original message
Hayden for CIA - Rove's Gambit
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_steven_l_060509_hayden_for_cia__96_rov.htm

Hayden for CIA – Rove’s Gambit
When a Move that Doesn’t Make Sense, Makes Sense
by Steven Leser


http://www.opednews.com


Steven Leser

Most of us, me included, missed a key reason why Bush nominated Hayden for the post of CIA Director. Sure, he is a loyal troop for Negroponte, Bush, and their policies, but this is incidental. What we must all remember is that Rove has recently been freed from other duties to concentrate on the 2006 election. Rove’s specialty is wedge issues. Rove’s earmarks are all over the immigration issue. From perusing sites like Free Republic, and reading Rush Limbaugh’s comments on the Hayden nomination, I see where Rove is going with the Hayden nomination as well.

One of the few policy areas where Bush still receives more positive than negative marks is National Security. A few months ago, Hayden made a ferocious defense of the warrant less wiretapping practice of the NSA. As I wrote in a previous article, there are secret FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) courts created to provide secret warrants to eavesdrop and search suspected terrorists and their enablers. I suspected, and Senator John Kerry confirmed in an address, that it is easy to obtain warrants with a rapid turnaround from these secret courts when the need arises. Thus, the end run performed by the NSA (Architected by Hayden with Bush administration approval) around the fourth and fifth amendments is unnecessary and a dangerous precedent. Using the secret courts to obtain a warrant for wiretapping provides at least a semblance of oversight and a paper trail that would tend to keep people using the FISA courts more honest. However, this is a nuanced argument that does not lend itself to sound bites. It will likely be much easier for the Bush administration to demagogue about Democrats being soft on National Security. It plays very well among Rush Limbaugh’s ditto-heads and the Freepers over at Free Republic, which is a good indication that it will appeal to the Republican base. It also appeals to the fears of voters throughout the political spectrum. The immigration issue is another wedge issue that allows Republicans to play on the fears of swing voters. It will be harping on issues like these that Rove and the GOP will hitch their collective hopes for election 2006.

Democrats like Senators John Kerry and Harry Reid, as well as Howard Dean and Representative Pelosi need to start hammering in the press on the ease and speed of getting warrants through the FISA courts and the legal and Constitutional ugliness of the NSA warrant less wiretapping practice. Hayden will put up another ferocious fight to defend himself and the practice and should not be underestimated. He will likely point to specific instances of using the wiretaps where they prevented ‘incidents’. This is going to turn into an important issue so Democrats on the Senate Judiciary committee need to be ready for this. The implications for this confirmation hearing go way beyond the CIA to the protection of our Constitutional rights and to election 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Last I heard, Bush has less than 50% approval on security issues.
He has no strong points to work from any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Steven - Take it a step further, why else would Rove want
Hayden in the position? So the NSA can directly influence elections across the nation by tapping into phone/internet lines that are connected to voting machines and central tabulators. I tihnk Rove played a starring role in the theft of Election 2004 -- and I think that NSA wiretaps were used to listen in on candidates & campaigns, 'lift' data from Dem computers, and modify election results on the night of the election.

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, but the man in the KNOW about *intelligence* IS
John Negroponte. It might please Rove, but IMO it was Negroponte's brainchild.

Please consider not holding this smarmy little gut puncher (KKKarl) on a "supernatural" Evil Pedestal ... if anything, the dead fruits of this Administration is a Team Effort.

BTW and IMO, Rove's going down. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hi all, thanks for the comments. A few responses...
SnF - Believe you me, I don't put Karl on a supernatural evil (I've been a fricken evil Doctor for thirty fricken years, OK?) pedestal, but his competency is in winning elections by any means necessary and he is really good at it. I think we are going to see a lot of Rove engineered wedge issues floated in the next few months. I know some people think he is behind everything. I assure you I am not like that. This issue just really smacks of Rove's involvement for some reason. And I agree 100% that he is going down. I can't wait to watch that frog march on my large screen TV. Might have to burn that video to DVD...

Oh and SnF, I think gut puncher is way too nice a term for Rove. If we're talking fight terms, think Below the belt, Head Butt, Rabbit Punch, Kidney Punch, Ear Bite, etc...

Electroprop - for some reason the GOP think they own the National Security issue. Painting Democrats as weak on National Security is a big part of their plans for election 2006. That is something you can take to the bank.

IndyOp - If that is true we are really lost...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks stevenleser - you've given me "quality stuff" to ponder :-) eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. My pleasure, think about Rove another way...
Edited on Tue May-09-06 08:00 PM by stevenleser
Bush should never have come close enough in either election to steal them. That was Rove's doing. He took Forest Gump and made him President. That is sheer competence and talent and incredibly impressive. It is used in the furtherance of evil (utterance of last three words accompanied by hand raised with pinky touching edge of mouth and palm positioned away from face) which is unfortunate, but he should not be (mis)underestimated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Processed and Understood
+ Thanks again for taking the time to fully explain your points. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC