Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove "Scoop" Remains Exclusive--WaPo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:16 AM
Original message
Rove "Scoop" Remains Exclusive--WaPo
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/05/22/BL2006052200323.html



By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, May 22, 2006; 7:42 AM

Robert Luskin, Karl Rove's lawyer, says he spent most of the day on May 12 taking his cat to the veterinarian and having a technician fix his computer at home.

He was stunned, therefore, when journalists started calling to ask about an online report that he had spent half the day at his law office, negotiating with Patrick Fitzgerald -- and that the special prosecutor had secretly obtained an indictment of Rove.

The cat's medical tests, Luskin says, found that "the stools were free of harmful parasites, which is more than I can say for this case."

The claim that President Bush's top political strategist had been indicted in the CIA leak investigation was written by a journalist who has battled drug addiction and mental illness and been convicted of grand larceny. That didn't stop more than 35 reporters -- from all the major newspapers, networks and newsmagazines -- from calling Luskin or Rove's spokesman, Mark Corallo, to check it out.

The reports appeared on the liberal Web site Truthout.org, run by Marc Ash, a former advertising man and fashion photographer in California. Jason Leopold, the author of the stories, directed inquiries to Ash, who says that "we stand by the story. We have multiple points of independent confirmation of what we originally reported. Our problem is, the prosecutor's office is under no obligation to go public."

Leopold acknowledges in a new book, "News Junkie," that he is a past liar, convicted felon and former alcoholic and cocaine addict. An earlier version of the book was canceled by publisher Rowman & Littlefield last year.....

WELL, NOW I'M TOTALLY CONFUSED!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. How can you tell if a lawyer is lying?
The old I took the cat to the vet all day story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I never take the cat to the vet to have him checked for parasites....
I just take the poopie. So there's lie number one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. "...former alcoholic and cocaine addict"
Sounds like he's describing the war-chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh good. More toilet paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kurtz is an idiot; I don't care what he has to say.
The one point I keep thinking about is this - sealed indictment. If it was sealed - NO ONE is going to talk about it, confirm it. Luskin is a liar, of course - what else is he gonna say? Admit to being in a closed meeting? Of course not.

Fitzgerald's camp won't confirm the story either because the indictment is sealed for a reason, and they apparently have bigger fish to fry. We can't even begin to know all of the aspects of the case.

And - no one has asked for a retraction from Truthout. If what Leopold reported is completely false, I would expect Rove's people to come down hard on them and demand an apology.

I choose to wait and see. Remember - sealed indictment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. good post n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is Leopold actually George W. Bush...
from the description it sure sounds like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Define "past."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. TO said they expected a hit piece from Kurtz. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. This is exactly what Rove did to Jim Hatfield.
He planted a story, namely about Georgie-poo's cocaine bust, with Hatfield, who dutifully wrote about it in Fortunate Son, & then blew Hatfield out of the water by disclosing his past history as a felon. Thus he tainted the coke story so no "legit" press would touch it.

Now, the question is, what's the game here? What's Rove's goal? My personal bet is that he's buying time because he knows there will be no indictment until after the Nov. elections. The big game for all these slime is to prevent a Dem majority in Congress, thereby heading off unpleasant investigations into their doings for the past 6 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC