Washington’s New Watchword: Containment [not Victory]

[rodeodance]

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12920385/site/newsweek

Washington’s New Watchword: Containment

As Iraq’s weak new government takes shape, the Bush administration’s best hope is for a non-bloodbath.

By Michael Hirsh
Newsweek
Updated: 1 hour, 46 minutes ago

May 22, 2006 - An old word is gaining new currency in Washington: containment. You may be hearing a lot more of it as the Bush administration hunkers down for its final two years. Containment of Iraq’s low-level civil war, which shows every sign of persisting for years despite the new government inaugurated this week. Containment of Iran’s nuclear power, which may lead to a missile defense system in Europe. Containment of the Islamism revived by Hamas and Hizbullah, by the Sunni suicide bombers in Iraq, as well as by the “Shiite Crescent”—as Jordan’s King Abdullah once called it—running from Iran through Southern Iraq and into the Gulf........


The U.S. military is already gearing up for this outcome, but not for “victory” any longer. It is consolidating to several “superbases” in hopes that its continued presence will prevent Iraq from succumbing to full-flown civil war and turning into a failed state. Pentagon strategists admit they have not figured out how to move to superbases, as a way of reducing the pressure—and casualties—inflicted on the U.S. Army, while at the same time remaining embedded with Iraqi police and military units. It is a circle no one has squared. But consolidation plans are moving ahead as a default position, and U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad has talked frankly about containing the spillover from Iraq’s chaos in the region.......

[unblock]

1. ha ha ha! i can't wait for "peace with dignity"!

:rofl:

[billybob537]

2. Three years in to it

we don't even control Baghdad.
WTF who can't see this is a screwjob.

[Tiggeroshii]

3. I am beginning to have trouble

..deciphering between the difference of his war strategy and the Republican's midterm strategy.

[Uben]

4. We had containment before the war!

And it was a hell of a lot cheaper, and no confirmed deaths. But, what's a couple of trillion dollars and tens of thousands of lives to a go-getter like Bush? Summon the jury!

[BleedingHeartPatriot]

5. Yes, yes, yes...my thoughts exactly. n/t

MKJ

[peacebird]

6. and the Iraqi's had more security and reliable utilities....

bush has screwed up in every job he has ever been given, and each time family "friends" have secured daddy's boy a new special job...

The Peter Principle in action.... "In a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence."