Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Editorials Oppose Iraq Withdrawals -- As U.S. Sends More Troops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 09:59 PM
Original message
Editorials Oppose Iraq Withdrawals -- As U.S. Sends More Troops

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002577027

Editorials Oppose Iraq Withdrawals -- As U.S. Sends More Troops


By Greg Mitchell (Opinion)

Published: May 29, 2006 11:15 AM ET

NEW YORK Monday marked another Memorial Day, this time with the American death toll in Iraq well past 2400 lives, with over 18,000 injured. Just over six months have passed since hawkish Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) called for the beginning of a U.S. pullout in Iraq – but just days ago, President Bush outlined his latest plan, amid rumors of a withdrawal, to "stay the course,” amid graphic reports of a new “My Lai.”

All of this would seem to call out for a re-thinking of positions or assumptions on newspaper editorial pages. Indeed, three of the most influential did weigh in Sunday with Iraq editorials. All of them, despite voicing strong crtiicism in the same editorials, came out against starting to bring the boys home.

This continues the depressing tradition of newspaper editorials saying most of the right things, and pressing charges against the administration’s handling of the war – while arguing for “more time” or “a few more months” for the latest “turning point” in Iraq to produce a positive outcome. This pattern could – and possibly will – go on nearly forever.

It ain’t funny how time slips away.

As Bob Herbert, the New York Times columnist, put it on Monday: "Pretty soon this war in Iraq will have lasted as long as our involvement in World War II, with absolutely no evidence of any sort of conclusion in sight."
........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. As long as WW2...
Edited on Tue May-30-06 10:25 PM by TwoSparkles
...now that is sick.

In WW2 we were organized, focus and fighting for peace and freedom. It took a long time because we were fighting Fascism and embroiled in a noble cause.

It's pretty disgusting that our country would expend enormous resources---and a time frame comparable to WW2--when we're killing innocent people for absolutely nothing.

This war is based on a lie--and we're going to spend just as much time on it as we spent knocking out a true tyrant and the spread of Fascism?

That's really, really sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC