Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My letter to the editor sent to an Idaho newspaper....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 05:06 PM
Original message
My letter to the editor sent to an Idaho newspaper....
Below is a letter I submitted for publication to the "main" newspaper in the state of Idaho on the legislatures recent passage of a resultion to amend Idaho's constitution to ban same-sex marriage. I hereby relinquish all claims to the letter and open it up for personal use to all members of DU and only DU.

Q3JR4.

*********************************************************************************

Our godly legislature has finally done its part to beat back the scourge of gay marriage. You and I get to cast our votes in the upcoming election to finish the job. The legislature has given us the moral ability to send a message to these homosexuals that they can’t expect to visit each other in hospitals when one or the other is sick, or pass their belongings on to their “partner” after death. I know that Idaho’s proposed amendment says nothing about limiting either of these so-called “rights” but amendments like this in other states with similar wording have been used to do just that. We will not rest until homosexual persons have no more ability to protect or care for each other than two strangers do.

While we’re at it we’ll push things back to the good old days when police officers could bust into the rooms of suspected homosexuals on a whim. Since a majority of Americans believe in an almighty God, I’m sure most of them won’t mind the same police force (AKA the “morals police”) peaking into their bedrooms from time to time just to keep the righteous righteous. I think we could all use a little help every now and again.

Besides, if we allow these people to marry each other what’s to keep a man from marrying a dog, or a box turtle? Sure we could amend the constitution to say that marriage is between two consenting human beings, but we may as well put those godless homosexual heathens on the same level as animals, lower since animals are actually useful.

Because of their perversions homosexuals are more likely to abuse children and die of diseases, non-scientific research carried out by non-scientists proves it. We can’t trust “real” scientific organizations like the American Pediatric Society or the American Psychological Association who have studied and dispute both claims because both organizations used “science” to prove “facts.” If I believe it and a majority of people in the world believe it, that makes it true: provable facts and reputable science be damned.

Who cares what science has to say? It’s not about what “science” tells us, it’s about what God tells us. In the bible, God’s immutable word, Leviticus 18:22 says “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.” What stricter words do you need than that to see what God thinks of the whole issue? To be sure, that book of the bible also calls eating or touching shellfish or pork an abomination (Leviticus 11:10, 11-7, 11-11, 11-24), but we can do what other religions (including some sects of Christianity) have done for thousands of years; pick and choose which verse of the holy book we need to to vilify our opponent. At the same time we’ll live the way we want to without applying the other verses around what we claim to believe to ourselves.

It is possible that even if we do change the constitution the youth (who mostly support homosexual marriage) will eventually vote to repeal the amendment. Therefore in the next election don’t vote for your congressman on the basis of a clean environment, the war on terror, fiscal responsibility, smaller government, or anything else congressmen are supposed to care about. The only way we can stop the next generation from legalizing gay marriage is, of course, by helping the Republicans to bring on the rapture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. More info...
In the email I recieved from the newspaper they told me that they got too many requests for Reader's Views (600 words) with not enough space. If I wanted the letter published, they said, I need to cut out 400 words. If anyone has an idea of what, from the letter above, would make the best impact on people in general please give me an idea. I've already decided to meet their requirements, but I like the rest of the letter too much to let any of it die.

Thanks in advance for any and all help.

Q3JR4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's my suggestions:
Keep the first paragraph, as it is quite strong. Paragraphs 4 & 5 are also quite useful, and I would keep them in. The weakest paragraph, imho, is the one about marrying animals. I get the irony, but I'm wonder if others would.

Too bad the entire letter can't be published.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's what I was
lamenting too. I've sent it on to a couple of other newspapers in the state and hopefully one of them will publish the whole thing.

Q3JR4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I disagree with ayeshahaqqiqa, P3
Was a totally new perspective to me.... reversing the situation to show how the religious right think that gay people deserve the rights of animals... I thought it was powerful.

Leave 6 as is, its great.

Its too hard, I like the whole thing... maybe you could scale back some lines from each paragraph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scribe Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ah, about police peaking in bedrooms. It's the peeking before
the peaking that's troublesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC