Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our enemies aren't drinking lattes (LAT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 08:29 PM
Original message
Our enemies aren't drinking lattes (LAT)
Edited on Sat Jul-08-06 08:31 PM by ovidsen
It's bad enough that Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld has given the Pentagon an indefensible job. It's worse that it's being done so badly.

Max Boot

Our enemies aren't drinking lattes


"AMATEURS TALK strategy. Professionals talk logistics." That well-worn saying, sometimes attributed to Gen. Omar Bradley, contains an obvious element of wisdom. Modern militaries cannot fight without a lengthy supply chain, and the success or failure of major operations can turn on the work of anonymous logisticians.

Yet there is a danger of professional soldiers becoming so focused on supply lines that they lose sight of larger strategic imperatives. In Afghanistan and Iraq, we may already have crossed that threshold.

(snip)

Most of our resources aren't going to fight terrorists but to maintain a smattering of mini-Americas in the Middle East. As one Special Forces officer pungently put it to me: "The only function that thousands of people are performing out here is to turn food into (excrement)."

How to explain this seemingly counterproductive behavior? My theory is that any organization prefers to focus on what it does well. In the case of the Pentagon, that's logistics. Our ability to move supplies is unparalleled in military history. Fighting guerrillas, on the other hand, has never been a mission that has found much favor with the armed forces. So logistics trumps strategy. Which may help explain why we're not having greater success in Iraq and Afghanistan.


http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-boot5jul05,0,5998634.column?coll=la-news-comment-opinions

edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh yes they are, our enemies are the corporate and special interest
...lobbyists in Washington DC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Let's not forget the ? % that really Voted for this Idiot!! Fucking Droids
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Militarism.
...Most of our resources aren't going to fight terrorists but to maintain a smattering of mini-Americas in the Middle East...

Chalmers Johnson described this as militarism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And when you have an official supplier it's Fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's the word
I'll go out on a limb and call it "institutional militarism".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. radio interview today w/a soldier in baghdad said the same ->
morale was better out in the killing zones than back at HQ because the soldiers got away from all the bloated bureaucracy and tons of people doing nothing to help the task besides pushing paper.

then again, maybe killing is more fun that pushing paper.

never mind.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/political-shirts.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. All in all, I'd say they eat pretzels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. If they're so good at moving supplies, why'd Halliburton get the job?
Just to get rid of treasury money and kick-backs to the war president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC