Huffpo has this editorial today by Eric Alterman concerning some extreme craziness erupting between The New Republic ("Old Media") and The Daily Kos site ("New Media")
Unfortunately, Alterman is so bogged down in analyzing the definition of "death threats" while alluding to the fact that an email under discussion in his piece was a forgery- without explaining further-- that his whole story seems so garbled and I'm at a loss to what his ultimate point really is.
I *think* he is attempting to shore up a defense of the liberal blogosphere, but I can only hope he will indeed get around one day to what he calls a more "central fact of the drama."
From: Of Death Threats and 'Death Threats'
(...)
For reasons I cannot fully explain, I became briefly obsessed on Friday afternoon with the Boston Globe's report of "death threats" against The New Republic's Jason Zengerle by members of the Kos community who did not like his reporting on Jerome Armstrong and Moulitsas Zúniga. The article, which was written by Globe intern, Michael M. Grynbaum, here, struck me as playing to all the clichés the mainstream media offers about the liberal blogosphere, but nowhere more than in the reporting of alleged "death threats" against Zengerle, which when I read it, I knew simply could not be true. (Why the article made no mention of what struck me as a central fact of the drama--Zengerle's employment of an accusatory e-mail that turned out to be a forgery--also piqued my curiosity/annoyance, but remains another story.)
Anyway, on Friday afternoon, I made a few calls and reached both Globe Washington bureau chief Peter Canellos and Jason Zengerle. (I could not reach the article's author, Grynbaum, who was not in the office, and does not have voicemail on the system.)
(...)
whole article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-alterman/of-death-threats-and-dea_b_24742.html(bold-face mine)
And here is the Boston Globe story under discussion:
Bloggers battle old-school media for political clout
Online journals gaining greater influence, scrutinyBy Michael M. Grynbaum, Globe Correspondent | July 6, 2006
WASHINGTON -- When a writer for The New Republic, the 92-year-old doyen of elite Washington opinion journals, accused the nation's most prominent political blogger of using his online clout to hush up a potential scandal involving a former business partner, he knew there might be some backlash from the so-called ``new media."
But he didn't expect death threats."
the rest:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/07/06/bloggers_battle_old_school_media_for_political_clout/ I ask myself if it's in fact a case that the email was a forgery? why the careless employment of that by TNR and the Globe is not
the real story?Will the liberal blogosphere (seemingly much disdained by the "old media" exerts) be seeing a retraction, a correction, a disclosure, an explanation from any of these involved "old/new media" parties?
Anybody?