Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Prince Of Darkness" Sheds Light On Valerie Plame by Bill Press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 12:44 PM
Original message
"Prince Of Darkness" Sheds Light On Valerie Plame by Bill Press
"Prince Of Darkness" Sheds Light On Valerie Plame
July 13, 2006
http://billpress.com/columns.html

When I called my friend and former co-host of “Crossfire” shortly after his column appeared and members of Congress were demanding an official investigation, he jokingly asked me: “Are you going to come visit me in jail?” And there’s no doubt in my mind that Novak would have gone to jail, if necessary, rather than break his reporter’s confidence by revealing his sources.


One other thing we learned: that George W. Bush can’t be trusted to keep his word. This is the same president, remember, who vowed, three years ago, to fire anyone “involved” in leaking Valerie Plame’s identity — anyone involved, not just anyone indicted. Yet, here we are, three years later, and Karl Rove still has his job. Not only that, he just got a big pay raise.

The truth is, Bush didn’t fire Rove because Rove was doing exactly what Bush and Cheney wanted: trying to destroy an outspoken critic of the war in Iraq by exposing his wife’s identity as an undercover CIA agent. In their campaign of disinformation about weapons of mass destruction, the last thing the Bush administration could tolerate was someone like Joe Wilson, who dared tell the American people the truth.

Technically, Bush, Cheney and Rove may not have broken the law. But they did break their pledge to put national security first. By blowing Valerie Plame’s cover, they showed they were willing even to throw national security out the window and put lives at risk, if necessary — anything to help make the case for their immoral, unwarranted and unnecessary war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Love the way he breaks it down into simple concepts!
First, as we’ve suspected for a long time, we learn that Karl Rove was right in the middle of the whole mess. True, he was not, as many thought, Novak’s original source. But he was one of Novak’s two secondary sources, and Rove also talked to Time magazine’s Matt Cooper. To both reporters, he confirmed that Plame was Ambassador Joe Wilson’s wife, worked at the CIA and played some role in Wilson’s being sent to Africa to investigate the Saddam/yellowcake rumors.

This means that when Rove sent Scott McClellan out to tell the media he had nothing to do with the leak of Valerie Plame’s identity, he put McClellan in the awkward position of lying. And when he told CNN last year “I didn’t know her name, I didn’t leak her name,” he was telling a big, fat lie himself.

One other thing we learned: that George W. Bush can’t be trusted to keep his word. This is the same president, remember, who vowed, three years ago, to fire anyone “involved” in leaking Valerie Plame’s identity — anyone involved, not just anyone indicted. Yet, here we are, three years later, and Karl Rove still has his job. Not only that, he just got a big pay raise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC