Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Study of Bias In the Associated Press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 03:37 AM
Original message
A Study of Bias In the Associated Press
A Study of Bias in the Associated Press

By Peter Phillips, Sarah Randle, Brian Fuch, Zoe Huffman, and Fabrice Romero

On October 25, 2005 the American Civil Liberties (ACLU) posted to their website 44 autopsy reports, acquired from American military sources, covering the deaths of civilians who died while in US military prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2002-2004. A press release by ACLU announcing the deaths resulted from torture was immediately picked up by Associated Press (AP) wire service, making the story available to US corporate media nationwide. A thorough check of Nexus-Lexus and Proquest electronic data bases, using the keywords ACLU and autopsy, showed that at least 95 percent of the daily papers in the US did not to pick up the story nor did AP ever conduct follow up coverage on the issue.

The autopsy reports provide positive proof of widespread torture by US forces. Our research team at Project Censored felt that this story should have been front page news throughout the country. Instead the story was hardly covered and quickly disappeared.
One of forty-four US military autopsy reports reads as follows: “Final Autopsy Report: DOD 003164, (Detainee) Died as a result of asphyxia (lack of oxygen to the brain) due to strangulation as evidenced by the recently fractured hyoid bone in the neck and soft tissue hemorrhage extending downward to the level of the right thyroid cartilage. Autopsy revealed bone fracture, rib fractures, contusions in mid abdomen, back and buttocks extending to the left flank, abrasions, lateral buttocks. Contusions, back of legs and knees; abrasions on knees, left fingers and encircling to left wrist. Lacerations and superficial cuts, right 4th and 5th fingers. Also, blunt force injuries, predominately recent contusions (bruises) on the torso and lower extremities. Abrasions on left wrist are consistent with use of restraints. No evidence of defense injuries or natural disease. Manner of death is homicide. Whitehorse Detainment Facility, Nasiriyah, Iraq.”

A second report describes how a 27-year-old Iraqi male died while being interrogated by Navy Seals on April 5, 2004 in Mosul, Iraq. During his confinement he was hooded, flex-cuffed, sleep deprived and subjected to hot and cold environmental conditions, including the use of cold water on his body and hood. The exact cause of death was “undetermined” although the autopsy stated that hypothermia may have contributed to his death.

Another Iraqi detainee died on January 9, 2004 in Al Asad, Iraq, while being interrogated. He was standing, shackled to the top of a doorframe with a gag in his mouth, at the time he died. The cause of death was asphyxia and blunt force injuries.
Anthony Romero, Executive Director of ACLU stated, “There is no question that US interrogations have resulted in deaths.” ACLU attorney Amrit Sing adds, “These documents present irrefutable evidence that US operatives tortured detainees to death during interrogations.”

Our research showed that the Los Angeles Times covered the story on page A-4 with a 635-word report headlined “Autopsies Support Abuse Allegations.” Fewer than a dozen other daily newspapers including: Bangor Daily News, Maine, page 8; Telegraph-Herald, Dubuque Iowa, page 6; Charleston Gazette, page 5; Advocate, Baton Rouge, page 11; and a half dozen others actually covered the story. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Seattle Times buried the story inside general Iraq news articles. USA Today posted the story on their website. MSNBC posted the story to their website, but apparently did not consider it newsworthy enough to air on television.

Given that nearly every daily newspaper in the United States subscribes to AP wire service and that AP had in fact sent out the torture story led us to question if story selection bias was widespread within US newspapers and if bias was evident within the AP system itself.

more at http://rawstory.com/showarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.projectcensored.org%2Fnewsflash%2Fap_bias.html

including:
Associated Press

Impeachment Movement and AP

AP Bias on the Israel-Palestine Conflict

AP Bias on the Overthrow of President Aristide in Haiti

AP’s Character Assassination of Cynthia McKinney

Associate Press as Protectors of the Powerful

AP is a massive institutionalized bureaucracy that feeds new stories to nearly every newspaper and radio/TV station in the United States and the world. They are so large that top-down control of single news stories is literally impossible. However, our evidence clearly indicates a built-in bias favoring the powerful. ACLU evidence on torture is ignored by the corporate press and AP never mentions it again. The State Department’s position on Haiti becomes established history. Cynthia McKinney is bashed and marginalized. Coverage of the Israel-Palestine situation has a clear pro-Israel bias, and the national impeachment movement is totally ignored. The American people absorb these biases and make political decisions on skewed understandings. Without media systems that provide balanced, fair and accurate reporting democracy is faced with a dismal future.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. DUers, please note: "Cynthia McKinney is bashed and marginalized,"
according to the ACLU report--one of its top examples of mis-reporting: "AP's Character Assassination of Cynthia McKinney."

And thanks a lot to all the DUers and trolls, troublemakers and "divide and conquerors," who bashed and marginalized Cynthia McKinney here in these supposedly Leftist threads, right along with the war profiteering corporate news monopolies.

I'm still burning over this. It was disgraceful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. A lot of covert racism often reveals itself in these posts...
These are the folks who either don't WANT the black vote or they DO want the black vote but want the black people to then just stfu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Disgusting. When will we say "Enough!"?
I reached it years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. But, but it's not state-run news media! We still live in a free country!
I'd rather have corporate overlords control the news media than the federal government!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Is there a difference, betweem the two, at this point? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush = War = Terror = Oil = Profits = Torture
Need one say more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
furman Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. CAMERA.org says AP has skewed Middle East reporting against Israel
CAMERA, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, has helped the AP with their fact-checking.
For example:

http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=2&x_outlet=2&x_article=1145

July 17, 2006
by Gilead Ini
UPDATED: AP Timeline Obscures Arab Attacks

July 17 update follows.

July 13, 2006 -- As Israel began responding to Hezbollah’s cross-border assault, the Associated Press was rewriting the history of conflict between Lebanon and Israel. On July 12, the wire service dispatched a skewed timeline entitled "A look at key events in Lebanon-Israel conflict."

This isn’t the first time the AP has demonstrated a lack of objectivity by echoing the Lebanese/Hezbollah narrative.

<snip>

Virtually every entry starts by naming Israel as the actor–"Israeli forces invade..."; "Israeli invades again..."; "the Israeli army moves into Beirut..."; "Israeli troops abduct Lebanese guerrilla..."; etc. By contrast, no aggressor is specified for the "attack on an Israeli bus" in 1978, nor the "guerrilla attacks" in 1996. Likewise, using the passive voice in the 1997 entry, AP avoids naming the killers of the Israeli soldiers.

<snip>

July 17 Update: New AP History is More Thorough and Balanced
Less than a week after the publication of AP's problematic timeline and CAMERA's critique, the wire service, to its credit, has dispatched a more thorough and balanced overview, "A look at the history of Lebanese-Israeli conflict."

The updated piece acknowledges ongoing attacks against Israel from Lebanon, mentioning by name the attacks in Kiryat Shmona and Ma'alot and referring to the "Katyusha rockets being fired by Hezbollah into Israel proper."

updated AP timeline referenced by the CAMERA.org article
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/17/AR2006071700340.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Media Control -- one of the 12 signs of fascism
8. Media Controlled

Controlled mass media - Sometimes the media are controlled directly by clumsy government functionaries. At other times, sympathetic corporate media insiders shape the themes indirectly, and therefor more skillfully. Image regularly trumps content as the "news" is presented breathlessly and with flashy stage effects.

A practiced formula of tenacious repetition brings even the most absurd lie into acceptance over time. By design, the very language itself and the coloration employed will push alternate views "out of the mainstream".

The terms of any remaining debate are narrowly defined to the state's advantage, making it easy to marginalize a truly differing perspective. Censorship and "self-censorship", especially in wartime, is common.

http://mvp-seattle.com/pages/pageFascism.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC