AmericanErrorist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-24-06 09:20 PM
Original message |
Foreign Policy: Think Again: Al Jazeera |
|
It is vilified as a propaganda machine and Osama bin Laden’s mouthpiece. In truth, though, Al Jazeera is as hated in the palaces of Riyadh as it is in the White House. But, as millions of loyal viewers already know, Al Jazeera promotes a level of free speech and dissent rarely seen in the Arab world. With plans to go global, it might just become your network of choice.
“Al Jazeera Supports Terrorism”
False, though the network makes little attempt to disassociate itself from those who do. This claim is one of the loudest arguments that Western critics have levied against the Arabic-language news channel since its inception 10 years ago, when the Doha, Qatar-based network pledged to present all viewpoints. Just as it describes in its motto, “The opinion and the other opinion,” Al Jazeera has lent airtime even to hated political figures and extremists, including prominent members of al Qaeda. It’s this willingness to present terrorists as legitimate political commentators that has prompted outspoken critics such as U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to refer to Al Jazeera’s coverage of the U.S.-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as “inaccurate and inexcusable.”
After all, when Al Jazeera offers its estimated 50 million viewers exclusive interviews of Osama bin Laden, it’s easy to confuse access with endorsement. And when a journalist who conducts those interviews is jailed for collaboration with al Qaeda, as Tayssir Alouni was in a Spanish court last year, the line between impartial observer and impassioned supporter is certainly blurred. In addition, al Qaeda is not the only terrorist group that reaches out to Al Jazeera. Besides the infamous bin Laden tapes—at least six of which the network has still never aired—Al Jazeera has also received tapes from insurgent groups in Iraq, renegade Afghan warlords, and the London suicide bombers.
But the network has never supported violence against the United States. Not once have its correspondents praised attacks on coalition forces in Iraq. The network has never captured an attack on the coalition “live,” and there’s no evidence Al Jazeera has known about any attack beforehand. Despite claims to the contrary, the network has never aired footage of a beheading. As for Alouni’s case, conclusive evidence has yet to be presented to the public. And there is nothing to suggest that the network’s funding is illegitimate. Allegations of supporting terrorism remain just that—allegations.http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3497&fpsrc=ealert060720
|
DYouth
(189 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-24-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I wouldn't be surprised if Bush had a few more bombs being sent their way |
|
Or something to attack them. They are a very fair mainstream media, which makes them a prime target for the ultimate propogandists of the Bush Adminstration.
|
Gman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-24-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. "...lent airtime even to hated political figures and extremists,..." |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-24-06 09:31 PM by Gman
sounds like Fox news
|
AlamoDemoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-24-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
3. What happen to Al-Jazeera is now happening to the UN small force in ...... |
|
southern Lebanon. IOF are deliberately attacking the UN observers in Lebanon.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |