They probably won't publish this, but WTF, I tried:

[dave123williams]

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008816


"Your article is as great a display of shining wit as I've ever read on this website.

Your assertion that tapping my conversations without cause is a power inherrent to the presidency in a time of war is as idiotic as your conclusion that habeas corpus is somehow an antequated idea. Your suggestion that this ruling is some kind of a publicity stunt is contemptible; this is a Judge who must have agonized over exposing herself to the mindless frothing attack dogs, and their ivory-tower-dwelling handlers in the GOP.

You lost, you deserved to lose. For people who so loudly proclaim how moral they are, and for smart fellas of such high stature, you sure don't seem to understand the difference between right and wrong."



I added the italics above to this post for emphasis, and so you could recognize that I called them 'whining shits' and 'fart smellers' kind of under the radar.

Juvenile, I know, but I couldn't help myself... :)

[Whoa_Nelly]

1. You have a right to your opinion, and you come across well

Hope you do get published :thumbsup:

Note* You should use SpellCheck. Written word has more power when the words are spelled correctly :hi:

[dave123williams]

2. Point taken; I was just *so pissed off* when I wrote that...

I didn't think to check :)

[Whoa_Nelly]

4. SpellCheck is your friend

:D

And reading a finished piece backward helps to find errors, too. :loveya:

[wryter2000]

3. It's antiquated

Otherwise, go for it. :bounce: