Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

End of an Affair-- A Truly Bizarre WaPo Editorial (Any Codebreakers?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:24 AM
Original message
End of an Affair-- A Truly Bizarre WaPo Editorial (Any Codebreakers?)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460_pf.html


It turns out that the person who exposed CIA agent Valerie Plame was not out to punish her husband.

Friday, September 1, 2006; A20



WE'RE RELUCTANT to return to the subject of former CIA employee Valerie Plame because of our oft-stated belief that far too much attention and debate in Washington has been devoted to her story and that of her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, over the past three years. But all those who have opined on this affair ought to take note of the not-so-surprising disclosure that the primary source of the newspaper column in which Ms. Plame's cover as an agent was purportedly blown in 2003 was former deputy secretary of state Richard L. Armitage.

Mr. Armitage was one of the Bush administration officials who supported the invasion of Iraq only reluctantly. He was a political rival of the White House and Pentagon officials who championed the war and whom Mr. Wilson accused of twisting intelligence about Iraq and then plotting to destroy him. Unaware that Ms. Plame's identity was classified information, Mr. Armitage reportedly passed it along to columnist Robert D. Novak "in an offhand manner, virtually as gossip," according to a story this week by the Post's R. Jeffrey Smith, who quoted a former colleague of Mr. Armitage.

It follows that one of the most sensational charges leveled against the Bush White House -- that it orchestrated the leak of Ms. Plame's identity to ruin her career and thus punish Mr. Wilson -- is untrue. The partisan clamor that followed the raising of that allegation by Mr. Wilson in the summer of 2003 led to the appointment of a special prosecutor, a costly and prolonged investigation, and the indictment of Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, on charges of perjury. All of that might have been avoided had Mr. Armitage's identity been known three years ago.

That's not to say that Mr. Libby and other White House officials are blameless. As prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald has reported, when Mr. Wilson charged that intelligence about Iraq had been twisted to make a case for war, Mr. Libby and Mr. Cheney reacted by inquiring about Ms. Plame's role in recommending Mr. Wilson for a CIA-sponsored trip to Niger, where he investigated reports that Iraq had sought to purchase uranium. Mr. Libby then allegedly disclosed Ms. Plame's identity to journalists and lied to a grand jury when he said he had learned of her identity from one of those reporters. Mr. Libby and his boss, Mr. Cheney, were trying to discredit Mr. Wilson; if Mr. Fitzgerald's account is correct, they were careless about handling information that was classified.

Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming -- falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior administration officials. He ought to have expected that both those officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from himself and his false charges by claiming that President Bush's closest aides had engaged in an illegal conspiracy. It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Another smoke screen by the White House using the editorial staff
...of the Washington Post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Fog machine...

... annoying more than obscuring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. "then other PR shills accidentally called a bunch of other reporters...
to unknowingly let it slip...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't understand why they think the ship has sailed.
The point is that the Bush Administration and its hatchetmen are always acquiring sensitive information. If that information came off a sheet handed to them from Colin Powell on Air Force One, or from Armitage's loose lips, what does it matter? The point is, what did they do with the information once they got it? They still used it to tarnish Wilson's reputation. Is that the kind of behavior you expect from professionals? And they still were in a position to determine if she was covert or overt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is Armitage falling on his sword for Libby?
Or Rove? The WaPo is so full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. still lying about the yellowcake story
"Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming -- falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi uranium-shopping in Niger"

what I know of Wilson's debunking have proven to be true, not the contrary

I think that it is the core of this propaganda piece and the question that should be asked is :

"what do you mean with "falsely" ?" because if the WAPO falls on that one, the whole accusation against Wilson doesn't make sense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Personally, I Think BushCo Got a Two-fer
By outing Valerie Plame, they not only hung Joe Wilson out to dry (or tried to), they also dicredited and stopped cold the important work his wife was doing to subvert the rush to war in the Middle East. The muddling of the facts temporarily aided their PNAC agenda--but it adds just one more crime to the list for which they will all hang together and seperately. We still hang traitors, don't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Here, Here! I've thought it was about shutting up Plame
all along & that Wilson was just a bonus.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't buy the idea of Armitage's disinterest
He signed the PNAC letter to Clinton urging him to invade Iraq. He's been in with Wolfowitz, Perle, Cheney and Rumsfeld since at least then so why do people say he had no axe to grind? I think the reluctance of his support for the war is overstated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. They are really after Wilson.
They have made a concerted effort to shift the focus from the crime of bringing down Brewster Jennings and Ms Plame and now they want to diminish Wilson. I call bullshit. The Wapo has zero credibility on this issue as far as I am concerned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. at best (for the shrubbies), this still shows some nefarious goings-on
at best it shows that novak first found out from armitage.

but it wouldn't be much of a story by itself, would it?

so novak told rove and/or libbey and or whomever and the shrubbies went to town on orchestrating the wilson smear.

it puts more blame on expendable people like armitage and novak, but still, the shrubbies knew this was classified information, even if it came to them first from novak.

moreover, even if the law can't touch them, the entire concept of blowing the cover of a cia agent working on nuclear wmd distribution while you're fighting a war on terror just for political revenge on the agent's husband is something that should get a president thrown out of town on a rail.

it's absolutely ridiculous. can you imagine for one minute ANY DEMOCRATIC ADMINISTRATION getting away with that sort of thing????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. Passing the HOT Potato...where oh where will it land?
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 07:29 AM by Tellurian
More evidence of fear and desperation of the 'DOMINO EFFECT' from the Bush WH..

Bush apparently has managed to garner a guarantee, or partial guarantee of protection from the powers that be, of taking responsibility from all things potentially embarrassing or worse yet, criminal. Which means the dubious position of responsibility taker is, as always, the number #2 and well deserved, position---Cheney!

Cheney is well aware how quickly this tenuous position of 'taking responsibility' could at any moment become deadly to his career. Prison, although not likely, the ever present Sword of Damocles dangles overhead, always threatening.

So, leesee- What are Cheney's alternatives...hmmm.. Finding someone willing to take the FALL?

Gee, what has Dick Armitage been doing lately. Someone should give him a call. See if we can set something up.. Worst case scenario, Dick ends up the fall guy..I end up temporarily in the mud..Hey, as always, I take a shower, Lynn and I go to Church on Sunday..and I make a date with my hunting buddy the following week (attorney) (he learned his lesson about giving me bad advise) and put all this crap behind us like it never happened.

OK..Dick is the fall back guy..but just to be safe. We occupy print with stories alleging the victim is really the cause of all the flap about blowing the cover on his wife...so, yeah- Lets roast Wilson awhile, soften him and his wife up a little...then go in for the kill..If by chance, Wilson escapes unscathed, we've still got Armitage and Libby..and I don't know who Rove thinks he is, but if push comes to shove..Rovey boy is my next hero!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. "the person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is ....
drumroll>>>>>>MR. WILSON!!!

Any pretense that the WP is a liberal newspaper is now vanquished, not that we needed any more evidence. So exposing a CIA agent is ok as long as it is just a little cozy gossip among frineds and people who dissent from the president have only themselves to blame if the president's henchmen go after their families?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. this is a truly evil hit piece
...and most of Washington will recognize it as such. Any pretense is gone. The Washington Post is the enemy of the American people now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The last paragraph is filled with lies
Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming -- falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior administration officials. <---there are three lies there

He ought to have expected that both those officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would point to his wife. ,--LIE

He diverted responsibility from himself and his false charges by claiming that President Bush's closest aides had engaged in an illegal conspiracy. <--- the only reason it isn't illegal is that it is next tom impossible to actually be illegal under that statute

It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously.<--they mean Wilson but the irony is a sad one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. kick
and thanks for the analysis, underpants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. The Washington Post has basically become a tabloid
devoid of all reality.

I often wonder whether they realize just how many people laugh at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC