October 14, 2006
October 14, 2006, 12:46 PM EDT
President Bush's shifting rationale for why the U.S. is in Iraq. The U.S.-led coalition invaded Iraq on March 20, 2003:
"States like these (Iraq, Iran and North Korea), and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic." -- State of the Union address, Jan. 29, 2002.
"My nation will work with the U.N. Security Council to meet our common challenge. If Iraq's regime defies us again, the world must move deliberately and decisively to hold Iraq to account." -- speech Sept. 12, 2002, to the U.N. General Assembly.
"If we know Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today -- and we do -- does it make any sense for the world to wait to confront him as he grows even stronger and develops even more dangerous weapons?" -- speech in Cincinnati, Oct. 7, 2002.
"We will consult, but let there be no misunderstanding: If Saddam Hussein does not fully disarm for the safety of our people and for the peace of the world, we will lead a coalition to disarm him. ... Secretly, without fingerprints, he could provide one of his hidden weapons to terrorists or help them develop their own." -- State of the Union address, Jan. 23, 2003.
http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-bush-on-iraq,0,2514885.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlinesHow can an irrational person possibly have a rational for anything?